Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Fraternity ensures citizens’ dignity, unity of nation, says Justice Nariman

- HT Correspond­ent letters@hindustant­imes.com SANCHIT KHANNA/HT

NEW DELHI: Fraternity is the only constituti­onal method of assuring the dignity of every individual citizen, former Supreme Court judge Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman said on Friday, while stressing that the cardinal principle must be given “some teeth”.

He was delivering the keynote address at the 13th V M Tarkunde memorial lecture in the national capital.

“If we are actually going to live by the cardinal principle of fraternity, which is the only constituti­onal method of assuring the dignity of every individual citizen of this country and of assuring the integrity and unity of this nation, it must be given some teeth,” he said.

The former top court judge emphasised that one of the fundamenta­l duties of a citizen under the Constituti­on pertains to the principle of fraternity and casts an obligation on citizens to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhoo­d, “transcendi­ng religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversitie­s”, and “renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women”.

“Fraternity is something that is very, very important so far as this nation is concerned, particular­ly at this time. We know that the criminal law is sometimes put in motion selectivel­y, but I am going to suggest a remedy... The moment a citizen petitions in the court against hate speech, the [civil] court can not only issue a declaratio­n and an injunction because of the fundamenta­l duty, it can also award punitive damages. Nothing hurts more than that which hurts the purse,” the former judge said.

During his address on the topic “Rights, Duties, Directive Principles: What is Fundamenta­l”, justice Nariman also said that civil courts should award punitive damages in hate speech case that disrupt harmony.

He asserted that while criminal law is selectivel­y put in motion at times, action taken by civil courts would go a long way towards preserving and protecting fraternity.

“Civil courts should take up a suit filed by any citizen against, say, hate speech. After all, it disrupts harmony and brotherhoo­d. So, if courts were to actually now take cognisance of civil suits in which these three things are done, it would go a long way towards preserving and protecting fraternity....” he said.

He also spoke on the constituti­onal scheme in relation to fundamenta­l rights and duties, and suggested that the government should distribute free copies of the Constituti­on in every possible language among the citizens enabling them to know their rights.

Justice Nariman pointed out that there is an obligation on the citizens to abide by the Constituti­on and its ideals and the cardinal value of fraternity — enshrined under the fifth fundamenta­l duty — is of crucial importance.

He also spoke on the effect of certain existing provisions in the

Constituti­on under the directive principles of state policy which seek to curtail further the right to property while empowering the State to ensure proper distributi­on of resources among people and prevent concentrat­ion of wealth.

The former SC judge hoped that the Supreme Court, in an appropriat­e case, examines whether such provisions under Article 39 can abridge the fundamenta­l right under Article 19 to carry out any trade or business and earn livelihood.

If the right under Article 19 can be snuffed out, justice Nariman warned, India will be no different from China or Russia.

While concluding his address, justice Nariman quoted a Supreme Court judgment and said, “Our tradition teaches tolerance, our philosophy preaches tolerance, our Constituti­on practices tolerance. Let us not dilute it.”

The event was attended by several dignitarie­s, including former Supreme Court judge justice Madan B Lokur and members of the bar. Justice Lokur highlighte­d the contributi­ons and “prophetic lectures” of former Bombay high court judge justice Vithal Mahadeo Tarkunde, in whose memory the lecture was instituted.

Born on July 3, 1909, justice Tarkunde was a prominent lawyer and civil rights activist credited with defending many activists and journalist­s jailed during the Emergency.

 ?? ?? Justice Rohinton F Nariman (second from right) being felicitate­d; Justice Madan B Lokur (right) is also on the dais.
Justice Rohinton F Nariman (second from right) being felicitate­d; Justice Madan B Lokur (right) is also on the dais.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India