Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Madras HC tells MHA to act against those taking part in ‘orderly system’

- Divya Chandrabab­u letters@hindustant­imes.com WIKIMEDIA COMMONS

CHENNAI: The “orderly system” must be eradicated by taking penal actions against higher ups who force their subordinat­es to do menial jobs, the Madras high court said on Friday, as it directed the ministry of home affairs to act against those found indulging in such practices.

A single bench of justice S M Subramania­m also said the “orderly system” is a violation of Article 21 of Constituti­on (assuring protection of life and personal liberty), and directed the reinstatem­ent of a Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) constable who was dismissed from service in 2014 for alleged indiscipli­ne after he refused to carry out personal tasks for his superiors.

Policemen doing household and menial work in residences of top police officials are known as “orderlies”. Justice Subramania­m in August had directed the Tamil Nadu government and police department to ensure the practice of “orderly system” is eradicated in entirety within the next four months.

“In the event of receiving any complaint from any person regarding the colonial practice of orderlies for personal works, then actions are to be initiated under the Discipline and Appeal Rules and also under the Law,” justice Subramania­m said in his order, seen by HT.

“That apart, the salary payable to the government employee, who was made to serve as orderly, should be recovered from the Officer concerned immediatel­y by following the procedures. Recovery of salary must be in addition to the department­al action,” he added.

The judge also directed the home ministry to take stringent action against erring officials in such cases. “The 1st (secretary, Union of India, ministry of home affairs) respondent shall ensure that the Government of India orders are effectivel­y implemente­d and actions are initiated against the Higher Officials, who all are practising the colonial system of orderly in their Battalion by using the constables/combatant/other employee for their personal works either at their residence or elsewhere.” The court was hearing a plea of CRPF constable M Muthu who accused his seniors of forcing him to indulge in activities beyond his duties.

 ?? ?? The HC was hearing a plea of a CRPF constable, accusing his seniors of assigning personal duties.
The HC was hearing a plea of a CRPF constable, accusing his seniors of assigning personal duties.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India