Hindustan Times (East UP)

OUTSIDERS DISTURBING BRAJ PEACE, SAYS PUROHIT MAHASABHA

- Hemendra Chaturvedi hemendra.chaturvedi@htlive.com

The Akhil Bhartiya Teerth Purohit Mahasabha (ABTPM) on Monday condemned the filing of a suit in Mathura court raising the Sri Krishna Janambhoom­i issue.

The petitioner­s, from other districts, have filed the case seeking removal of the mosque from there, claiming it was built after razing a temple by the then Mughal emperor Aurangzeb.

“Residents of Braj area (with Mathura as epicenter) are living in peace with no issue being raised related to Sri Krishna Janambhoom­i and adjoining Shahi Eidgah mosque. Few outsiders have come and filed a court case, damaging the fabric of harmony here,” said Mahesh Pathak, president of ABTPM, having its headquarte­r in Haridwar.

“Things in Mathura are different from Ayodhya, where Lord Rama was living in a makeshift arrangemen­t in the open. We have an elaborate arrangemen­t here in Mathura, where a grand temple is constructe­d at Sri Krishna Janambhoom­i,” stated Pathak, who said an agreement had taken place in 1968 paving the way both for the temple and the mosque.

Pathak questions the timing of filing the court case “after the matter related to the Ram temple in Ayodhya got settled.”

The plaintiffs are from Delhi, Lucknow, Basti and Siddharth Nagar and the next date fixed by the court is September 30.

However, Gopeshwar Chaturvedi of Sri Krishna Janm Sewa Sansthan finds no wrong in filing of the suit in court.

The sansthan has been impleaded in the case as defendant number 4 in the suit filed on behalf of Bhagwan Sri Krishna Virajman through next friend Ranjana Agnihotri from Lucknow.

“The Shahi Eidgah Mosque is a symbol of atrocities that Hindus faced. It was built after razing a temple. The Muslim brothers should willingly hand over the land to Sri Krishna Janambhoom­i. Mosques and temples can be many but ‘janmabhoom­i’ cannot be more than one,” said Chaturvedi.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India