Hindustan Times (East UP)

HC restrains UP from compoundin­g illegal constructi­ons

- Jitendra Sarin letters@htlive.com letters@htlive.com

The Allahabad high court has restrained the Uttar Pradesh government and all developmen­t authoritie­s in the state from compoundin­g any illegal constructi­on pursuant to the Compoundin­g Scheme-2020 notified by the UP government on July 15 this year.

As per the compoundin­g scheme, various constructi­ons not permissibl­e in the building bye-laws have also been made compoundab­le.

Hearing a writ petition filed by one Mohd Meherban Ansari and three others on Wednesday,

Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra also directed additional secretary of the department concerned to file a reply justifying the compoundin­g scheme. The court has fixed October 20 as the next date of hearing.

The court observed, “A prima facie perusal of the Compoundin­g Scheme-2020 would go to show that the illegaliti­es committed by violating the provisions of the UP Urban Planning and Developmen­t Act, 1973 (Act of 1973) by raising illegal constructi­ons are sought to be regularize­d upon payment of huge compositio­n fee. The authoritie­s of the state government are expected to act in furtheranc­e of the object of the Act, so as to stop illegal constructi­ons and not to encourage such illegal constructi­ons upon payment of hefty amount.”

The court further said: “This would clearly discourage the honest citizens who ensure compliance of laws by obtaining prior permission as per the Act of 1973, inasmuch as they are subjected to stricter norms provided in the building bye-laws, while those who violate the law are allowed to raise much larger constructi­ons, which is not even permissibl­e in the building byelaws. The Compoundin­g Scheme, 2020, otherwise appears to be wholly beyond the scope of the Act of 1973, including Section 32. Section 32 only permits compositio­n of offences and does not permit raising of constructi­ons contrary to the building plan. The compoundin­g of developmen­t undertaken contrary to the Act of 1973 is therefore, prima facie, found to be clearly contrary to the aims, objectives and the provisions of the Act of 1973.”

The court directed the state government to communicat­e this order to all the developmen­t authoritie­s in the state for necessary compliance.

Those found misusing relaxation­s given under Covid-19 unlock guidelines in Varanasi will face action the Goonda Act and their arms licences would also be seized, said district magistrate Kaushal Raj Sharma on Friday.

He said under the Goonda Act, those who had become habitual of breaching peace

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India