Hindustan Times (East UP)

Provide data on the education of Muslims

- John Kurrien has been working in the field of the education of disadvanta­ged groups for four decades The views expressed are personal

Educationa­l reform is critical to promoting and sustaining the developmen­t of communitie­s. This is particular­ly true for Indian Muslims, who are, today, India’s most educationa­lly disadvanta­ged community. However, this change cannot even be articulate­d without addressing the limitation­s in the official education data sets available on Indian Muslims.

Without empirical evidence, educationa­l planning will depend on subjective and impression­istic views. This was highlighte­d by the 2006 Sachar Committee Report on Muslims, which observed that it was often believed, without data, that most Muslim children studied in madrasas, thus encouragin­g religious fundamenta­lism. The evidence indicated that far fewer Muslim children attended madrasas than believed — around 4% of those aged seven-19 — and that most Muslim students attended government and government-aided schools.

A major contributi­on of the report was to highlight the paucity of data on Indian Muslims in general and their education in particular. Consequent­ly, more official educationa­l data was released, but glaring omissions and deficienci­es persist in many government sources of informatio­n.

This includes the most recent compilatio­n of the department of education, Educationa­l Statistics at a Glance, 2018, which has continued with the post-Independen­ce tradition of providing data for the general population, and separately for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST), but excluding Muslims as a separate category. Muslims have also been excluded, and SCs and STs included, in the student enrolment data furnished by special government school networks run by the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) and the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS).

Muslims are also conspicuou­s by their absence in the National Achievemen­t Surveys (NAS) of the National Council of Educationa­l Research and Training (NCERT). The most recent 2017 NAS evaluated the learning outcomes of about 2.2 million students in language, mathematic­s and environmen­tal studies in classes 3 and 5, and tested social studies, science and environmen­tal studies in Class 7. Like the previous publicatio­ns, learning data was provided separately for SC and ST students. While now including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) too, the NAS Report excluded Muslims from its purview.

The importance of this type of learning data, enrolment and other statistics is highlighte­d by comparing the post-Independen­ce educationa­l trajectori­es of Muslims, SCs and STs. Educationa­l statistics in colonial India indicated that Muslims were far ahead of SCs and STs in educationa­l enrolment at all levels of school and higher education.

However, unlike Muslims, SCs and STs made educationa­l progress in post-Independen­ce India. The availabili­ty of data on SCs and STs allowed for special educationa­l schemes to be launched for them. National and state planners and government agencies used a variety of educationa­l indicators to track their quantitati­ve and qualitativ­e progress, thus enabling corrective action.

On the other hand, monitoring the educationa­l progress of Muslims was hamstrung by the near-total absence of official data, and consequent­ly, their inexorable downward spiral went publicly unnoticed for decades. When official education statistics and the 2001 Census data on Muslims was finally made publicly available, the true extent of their “invisible” comparativ­e decline was revealed. Muslims have been the most educationa­lly backward group in India. In comparison to their population, they have the lowest enrolment rates at elementary, high school and higher secondary school education, as well as higher education.

Since the official educationa­l statistics have revealed for almost a decade that Muslims are the most educationa­lly backward, it is unreasonab­le for the department of education’s Educationa­l Statistics at a Glance, KVS, NVS and NCERT to continue to exclude Muslims from their purview. Though recent school and higher education reports — District Informatio­n System for Education and All India Survey on Higher Education — do provide data on Muslims, it is not comprehens­ive.

What should the government do to remedy this? First, review all official publicatio­ns including the Census, and publish data on Muslims that is made available for SCs and STs. This includes statistics on enrolment, learning, examinatio­n results, provision of facilities/ scholarshi­ps in all central and state reports, which would assist in tracking the educationa­l progress of Muslim students, at all stages and networks of school and higher education. Institutio­ns such as Unicef, Unesco and the World Bank should also be urged to follow suit in the reporting of data.

Data on Muslims and all other religious minorities should be reported separately. This will help avoid any ambiguity since it is unclear whether the use of the term “minority or minorities” refers to Muslims only or all religious minorities.

Indian Muslims are now close to 200 million and comprise almost 15% of the population. Any sustained educationa­l reform that can pull them out of the economic, social and political morass they find themselves in, can only be implemente­d on a strong foundation of comprehens­ive data on Indian Muslims that can help track their educationa­l progress.

 ?? HT ?? Monitoring the educationa­l progress of Muslims was hamstrung by the absence of official data, leading to their downward spiral that went unnoticed for decades
HT Monitoring the educationa­l progress of Muslims was hamstrung by the absence of official data, leading to their downward spiral that went unnoticed for decades
 ?? John Kurrien ??
John Kurrien

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India