Hindustan Times (East UP)

NGT panel finds damage to 30% mangroves in Kakinada

- Srinivasa Rao Apparasu letters@hindustant­imes.com

HYDERABAD: A joint committee constitute­d by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) to look into the cutting of mangrove forests in the coastal area of Kakinada in Andhra Pradesh’s East Godavari district for a housing project, has confirmed destructio­n of nearly 30% of the mangrove area at the site. The committee also directed the district administra­tion not to proceed with the township project and to take “remedial measures” for “rejuvenati­on of mangroves”.

In its report submitted to the southern bench of the NGT on March 17, the committee observed that out of the total extent of mangroves spread over 116 acres, work has been taken up on 58 acres for “Navaratnaa­lu-Pedalanadi­rki Illu” (nine jewels-house sites for the poor) programme, thereby affecting mangroves in an extent of 30% of the filled-up area. The house sites’ distributi­on programme was launched on December 25, but the preparator­y work like identifica­tion of sites and levelling of sites began in March 2020.

“The mangrove area also falls under Coastal Regulatory Zone-I area (CRZ-I), which is ecological­ly sensitive and the geomorphol­ogic features of this zone play a role in the maintainin­g the integrity of the coast. As per CRZ notificati­on 2011, no new constructi­on shall be permitted in CRZ-I,” the committee noted.

District collector D Muralidhar Reddy, who was also one of the members of the committee, said the government had initiated the process of change in the CRZ category of the said land from CRZ-I to CRZ II, as the land is not a notified forest land, but a waste land.

The NGT, in its order dated March 18, directed that the district administra­tion should not proceed with further developmen­t of the township in the said area till necessary permission­s from competent authoritie­s are obtained. The tribunal directed that the government take remedial measures for rejuvenati­on of mangroves and other trees in that area considerin­g the ecosensiti­veness of that area.

“Besides, considerin­g the nature of damage alleged to have committed, the government must quantify the damage caused to the environmen­t taking into account the amount required for re-rejuvenati­on of the mangroves and loss of green cover and restoratio­n of the same in that area to protect the environmen­t,” the tribunal said and posted the case to April 26.

The committee, however, felt there is no threat to the existing Coringa Wild Life Sanctuary due to the housing project, which is located at about 3 km away.

The committee was constitute­d on April 30, 2020, following a petition filed by environmen­talist Satyanaray­ana Bolishetty in the NGT, challengin­g the state government’s decision to fell and remove mangroves and fill up the land to develop house sites for the poor.

 ?? HT PHOTO ?? The NGT directed that the district administra­tion should not proceed with further developmen­t of the township.
HT PHOTO The NGT directed that the district administra­tion should not proceed with further developmen­t of the township.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India