Hindustan Times (East UP)

Judge seeks session with psychologi­st before verdict

- Divya Chandrabab­u letters@hindustant­imes.com

CHENNAI: A Madras high court judge on Wednesday fixed an appointmen­t with a psychologi­st to understand same sex orientatio­n better before recording his judgment in a case pertaining to a lesbian couple who sought protection from their birth families who were opposed to their relationsh­ip, and directed the Tamil Nadu police to close the First Informatio­n Report filed on the basis of a missing person’s complaint filed by the parents of both women.

Justice N Anand Venkatesh said that he would want to undergo an educationa­l session with Vidhya Dinakaran, a citybased psychologi­st, while hearing the petition. “Ultimately in this case, the words must come from my heart and not from my head, and the same will not be possible if I am not fully ‘woke’ on this aspect,” justice Venkatesh said. “For this purpose, I want to subject myself for psycho-education with Vidhya Dinakaran and I would request the psychologi­st to fix a convenient appointmen­t for the same. I honestly feel that such a session with a profession­al will help me understand same-sex relationsh­ips better and will pave way for my evolution. If I write an order after undergoing psychoeduc­ation, I trust that the words will fall from my heart.”

In a previous hearing, the court had directed the petitioner­s as well as their parents to undergo counsellin­g and Dinakaran had submitted a report to the judge on Wednesday.

The court noted that the psychologi­st’s opinion is that the petitioner­s “perfectly understand the relationsh­ip they have entered” and that there was “no confusion in their minds”. It was also observed that they have a lot of love and affection for their parents and that their only fear is that they may be coerced into separation. “According to the psychologi­st, such a scenario will cause a lot of mental trauma to the petitioner­s,” the judge observed. “The petitioner­s are also willing to wait for their parents, whom they fervently hope will understand the relationsh­ip at some future point of time.”

Meanwhile, the parents of both the petitioner­s, the court observed, were worried of stigma in the society and the security of their daughters. A total of four petitions pertaining to same-sex marriage are pending before the high courts of Delhi and Kerala, challengin­g various acts that restrict marriage to opposite sex or heterosexu­al couples. Though the Supreme Court read down Section 377, which criminaliz­ed same-sex adult consensual relationsh­ips, in 2018, several samesex couples continue to seek protection from the court as their birth families continue to oppose their sexuality.

If I write an order after undergoing psycho-education, I trust that the words will fall from my heart JUSTICE N ANAND VENKATESH, Madras HC judge

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India