Hindustan Times (East UP)

No one would be deprived of ration, Delhi govt tells HC

- Richa Banka richa.banka@htlive.com

NEW DELHI: The Delhi government has told the Delhi high court that it will set up exclusive stores in different parts of the city for doorstep delivery of ration to ensure that those who are not at home can collect it at their convenienc­e.

The government, which filed an affidavit that was filed in an ongoing challenge to its doorstep delivery of ration scheme, asserted that Delhi Consumer’s Cooperativ­e Wholesale Store Ltd (DCCWS) will set up these exclusive Fair Price Shops (FPS) across various districts, and added that no one will be deprived of foodgrains even after the introducti­on of the doorstep ration delivery scheme.

The scheme has become another flashpoint between the BJP-led Union government and the AAP government in Delhi, with the former saying that the plan violates the provisions of National Food Security Act (NFSA) and will deprive migrants of foodgrains, and the latter pointing out that it will root out ration mafia and ensure that all beneficiar­ies get their ration. “Beneficiar­ies who will choose doorstep delivery but miss it, or wish to collect the specified food articles (SFAs) on their own will be able to get it from the circle-level FPS. Beneficiar­ies who do not opt home delivery will continue to get their ration from the current FPS. Therefore, it is a misconcept­ion that the GNCTD (Delhi government) is seeking to do away with FPS,” the Delhi government said in the affidavit filed on November 18 before a bench of justices Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh.

The Delhi government is contesting a petition by the Delhi Sarkari Ration Dealers Sangh, a group of FPS owners, in which they have challenged the doorstep ration delivery scheme and demanded that it should be declared ultra vires (beyond one’s legal power or authority).

The state government has said that the petitioner associatio­n’s contention is “entirely mischievou­s”. It has also said that not a single beneficiar­y has questioned the mode and manner of implementa­tion of the scheme, and an overwhelmi­ng majority of the ration beneficiar­ies in Delhi have opted to receive foodgrains at their doorstep.

On Monday, the Centre reiterated before the court that the state cannot mitigate the architectu­re of ration delivery mandated under NFSA. Additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati argued that FPS forms an integral part of the food security act. “If the state wants, it is free to give benefit higher than NFSA, but they cannot mitigate or militate the architectu­re of the Act,” Bhati told the court on Monday.

She added that while the Act mandates obligation­s of both the central as well as state government, it is the state government which is responsibl­e for the execution (of the provisions of the Act) under by the law.

“We have no role in the selection of fair price shop owners. It is not that the system is placed by us and the state is prejudiced. It is chosen by the state government,” Bhati argued. The arguments will continue on November 29. The Delhi government’s doorstep delivery of ration scheme was launched on March 25, but the Union food and consumer affairs ministry wrote to the Delhi government on March 19 raising two objections — the use of the term “mukhyamant­ri (chief minister)” for a scheme involving the distributi­on of food grains allocated under NFSA, and that any change in the delivery mechanism requires an amendment in NSFA that can be done only by Parliament.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India