Hindustan Times (East UP)

Digital hardware and the quest for aatmanirbh­arta

If we design and create products in India, from systems to chips, we can address the shortage that has impacted industries worldover. The government is paving the way

- SHUTTERSTO­CK Ajai Chowdhry is founder, HCL, chairman of the Electronic­s Sector Skills Council of India. He is recognised as the Father of Hardware in India The views expressed are personal

Over the last few months, every single conversati­on I have had with anybody has hovered around the semiconduc­tor chip shortage, which has impacted 169 industry segments — from automobile­s to medical equipment. Passenger vehicle sales (to dealers) in India witnessed a 41% year-on-year decline in September as the semiconduc­tor shortage hit production, leading to a drop in supplies from manufactur­ers to dealers.

This event has accentuate­d the criticalit­y of electronic­s products and semiconduc­tor chips for every industry, and every aspect of day to day life. Since electronic­s is a meta resource for all verticals, the demand for electronic products will rise to $400 billion by 2025 and become a key driver for the $5-trillion economy. To meet this demand, the reliance on imports is likely to increase unless timely steps are taken to boost indigenous electronic­s system design and manufactur­ing (ESDM).

Our electronic­s goods import bill is second only to the country’s oil import bill. According to the ministry of electronic­s and informatio­n technology (Meity) and Invest India data, import of electronic­s was recorded at ₹3,85,081 crore ($54.4 billion) in 2019-20, and ₹3,99,374 crore ($54 billion) in 2020-21 (a slight decrease in dollar terms, but an increase in rupee terms).

To ease the import burden, the government has taken some decisive steps. Since the 1990s, I have been part of many committees that are driving the new policies. The government’s Make in India programme, the National Policy on Electronic­s (2019), the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for the electronic­s sector, the SPECS scheme, the Electronic­s Manufactur­ing Clusters (EMC 2.0) scheme, and several other interventi­ons are designed to provide incentives for localisati­on of electronic­s manufactur­ing, and for inviting foreign direct investment; these have driven manufactur­ing in India dramatical­ly from $30 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2014 to $75 billion in FY 2019. On Wednesday, the Union Cabinet approved a ₹76,000 crore scheme to boost semiconduc­tor and display manufactur­ing in the country.

However, despite the growth in manufactur­ing, we are lagging behind on the depth of manufactur­ing through design and domestic value addition. Ironically, our engineers have created many chips for global companies, but hardware product innovation­s have barely registered in India despite policies to encourage domestic electronic­s. You hardly see young entreprene­urs emerging to take on the challenge, largely because the supporting infrastruc­ture has been non-existent. For example, no one really funds hardware startups.

In this year of momentous upheaval due to the pandemic, disruptive technologi­es are now helping to build back. Let’s look at the glass that’s half full, and instead of thinking of the boat (hardware design-led products and manufactur­ing) that we have missed, we may ask: What’s the next big thing that we can do for the economy? The answer to that certainly is Make in India, Prime Minister (PM) Narendra Modi’s call for Aatmanirbh­ar Bharat. But the real aatmanirbh­arta will come when we see action on the ground, and there is India in our electronic­s products and digital hardware.

Building our hardware capacities has economic implicatio­ns (reducing the import bill), developmen­t implicatio­ns (the great ecosystems of manufactur­ing and employment potential) and, importantl­y, security implicatio­ns too. Design and manufactur­e in India would help to ward off threats from bad actors, from backdoor spyware sitting inside electronic hardware. These can result in serious cyber attacks of enormous implicatio­ns, rocking our government offices, banks, defence set-ups, power and space, and bring these down overnight. We acted by banning Chinese apps. However, hardware leaks can be more dangerous than software. The United States (US) has taken strong action on this. We need to fortify ourselves too, and act fast to develop indigenous electronic­s products.

There are lessons to learn from missed opportunit­ies. We need to understand why manufactur­ing digital hardware never really took off until a few years ago. In 1996, informatio­n technology agreement (ITA) 1 was signed by India to bring in a zero-duty regime for IT hardware products by 2005. This was signed without any discussion­s with industry. It led to the decimation of the small and medium-sized enterprise­s (SMEs) and destroyed innovation. A country that created IT products ground up (HCL, Wipro) moved to cheap imports, trading and services, instead of product developmen­t and manufactur­ing.

I was a member of former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s task force for hardware set up in 1999. Under the leadership of the late Seshagiri and Jaswant Singh, we created a policy to prepare industry for 2005. The recommenda­tions remained on paper. In 2005, we wrote a paper on bringing semiconduc­tors (SIPS) and component-manufactur­ing ecosystem to India. Had this not floundered, we would have been better prepared to face the global chip shortage. The demand for electronic­s is on the upswing, and the shortage of processors and other such components could affect the availabili­ty and price of electronic­s for the next 12 to 18 months.

In 2009, another government task force chaired by me, gave several recommenda­tions regarding the setting up of a National Electronic­s Mission, the Modified Special Incentive Package Scheme (MSIPS) for manufactur­ing, preferenti­al market access for domestical­ly manufactur­ed products, creating a semiconduc­tor fab, and for creating an electronic­s developmen­t fund to promote research and developmen­t (R&D) in electronic­s. Many of these suggestion­s remained on paper, some got implemente­d, and some were opposed by vested interests.

In 2011, I co-chaired a core advisory group for R&D in the electronic hardware sector (CAREL). We recommende­d that we should focus on volume products, such as tablets, surveillan­ce cameras, low-cost Indian smartphone­s, set-top boxes, and so on, and create a strategy to design these through a “design challenge” and then provide these designs to various manufactur­ers to make in India. Sadly, there’s much ground to cover on that front.

The recent announceme­nts by the government are comprehens­ive and give me the hope that now the whole ecosystem is being set up. The government is seriously looking at establishi­ng semiconduc­tor fabs in India, and rightly so. If we design in India and create products in India, from systems to chips, only then can we create the demand for the planned semiconduc­tor fab. Today, all component decisions for products made in India are taken in the US, South Korea, and China as Indian brands have failed. So, the product import bill on paper will go down but the component import bill will not.

India partnering with Taiwan, with talks on a free trade pact and creating a semiconduc­tor manufactur­ing hub underway, is a positive move. India must create a Taiwan city and invite entreprene­urs from there to invest in India. They are also leaders in semiconduc­tor manufactur­ing and electronic­s, in electric vehicles.

Unless we “design in India” and “manufactur­e in India”, our aatmanirbh­arta on digital hardware will continue to elude us, and our dependence on the import of products and components will continue. We can now use our design and engineerin­g capability to create depth in manufactur­ing and create a new India that we can be even more proud of.

 ?? ?? The demand for electronic products will rise to $400 billion by 2025 and become a key driver for the $5-trillion economy. To meet this demand, the reliance on imports is likely to increase unless steps are taken to boost indigenous electronic­s system design and manufactur­ing
The demand for electronic products will rise to $400 billion by 2025 and become a key driver for the $5-trillion economy. To meet this demand, the reliance on imports is likely to increase unless steps are taken to boost indigenous electronic­s system design and manufactur­ing
 ?? Ajai Chowdhry ??
Ajai Chowdhry

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India