Hindustan Times (East UP)

HC junks plea seeking removal of PM’s photo

- Letters@hindustant­imes.com

THE KERALA HC ALSO IMPOSED A COST OF ₹1 LAKH ON PETITIONER BY TERMING THE PETITION AS “FRIVOLOUS”

KOCHI: The Kerala High Court on Tuesday dismissed a plea seeking removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s photograph from Covid-19 vaccinatio­n certificat­es and imposed a cost of ₹1 lakh on the petitioner by terming the petition as “frivolous”, being “politicall­y motivated” and a “publicity interest litigation”.

Justice P V Kunhikrish­nan directed the petitioner -- Peter Myaliparam­pil -- to deposit the cost in favour of the Kerala State Legal Services Authority (KeLSA) within six weeks.

The court said in case of failure to deposit the cost within the stipulated period, KeLSA shall recover the amount from his assets by initiating revenue recovery proceeding­s against him.

It said the cost was being imposed to let people and the society know that frivolous pleas like this which waste judicial time will not be entertaine­d by the court.

The court also said that the “frivolous contention­s” by the petitioner objecting to the PM’s photo and his “morale boosting message” on the vaccinatio­n certificat­e, was “not expected from a citizen of the country”.

It also said that when there are thousands of criminal appeals, bail pleas, civil suits and matrimonia­l cases pending in the courts, frivolous petitions like the instant one waste judicial time.

The court had previously observed what was wrong in Covid-19 vaccinatio­n certificat­es carrying the photograph of the Prime Minister when he was elected to power by the people of the country.

The court had also remarked, “They may not be proud of their PMs, we are proud of our PM” and had asked the petitioner -“why are you ashamed of the Prime Minister? He came to power through the mandate of the people...we may have different political views, but he is still our PM.”

The petitioner had contended that the certificat­e was a private space with personal details on record and therefore, it was inappropri­ate to intrude into the privacy of an individual.

He had contended that adding the Prime Minister’s photo to the certificat­e was an intrusion into an individual’s private space.

The petitioner, a senior citizen, had contended in his plea that the Prime Minister’s photo on his vaccinatio­n certificat­e was a violation of fundamenta­l rights.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India