Hindustan Times (East UP)

SC slams Punjab govt, MLA for cases against rape complainan­t

- HT Correspond­ent letters@hindustant­imes.com

ACCEPTING THIS PLEA, THE BENCH STAYED ALL PROCEEDING­S AGAINST THE WOMEN AND HER FAMILY MEMBERS FOR TWO WEEKS.

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday pulled up the Punjab government and Lok Insaaf party MLA Simarjeet Singh Bains over registrati­on of four criminal cases against a woman and her family members after she got a rape case lodged against the legislator.

A bench, headed by chief justice of India NV Ramana, questioned Bains’ conduct in reportedly using his influence as an MLA, as it demanded a report from the state government on how the criminal cases were lodged against the complainan­t and her family members after the rape case was registered.

The bench, which also comprised justices AS Bopanna and Hima Kohli, was hearing a petition by Bains seeking protection from arrest in the alleged rape case. “Have you seen the conduct of your client? He is a two-time MLA and this is the way he behaves? He is a public servant and he starts registerin­g cases against the lady,” the bench asked senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, who appeared for Bains.

The court then called upon the Punjab government’s advocate general, D S Patwalia. “What is happening in your state? How many cases has he (Bains) filed against the lady? He wants to keep on filing cases and you register everything. As a state, you cannot be a party to this kind of misuse of police machinery,” it said.

Patwalia, on his part, said that there were proceeding­s initiated against Bains but some of them have been stayed by subordinat­e courts. The bench, however, asked Patwalia to gather all relevant informatio­n on how four cases came to be filed against the complainan­t and her family members and file a detailed affidavit. At this point, Rohatgi submitted that his client had nothing to do with the registrati­on of cases against the complainan­t. “She ran a fake job racket and those who were duped got these cases registered. I have nothing to do with it,” Rohatgi argued on behalf of Bains.

Advocate Gagan Gupta, who represente­d the complainan­t against Bains, requested the court to stay the proceeding­s in the criminal cases till the state government comes clear on the issues raised. Accepting this plea, the bench stayed all proceeding­s against the women and her family members for two weeks. On Bains, the court decided to wait for a detailed affidavit from the state government and extended protection from arrest to the MLA for another week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India