Hindustan Times (East UP)

Can’t force people: SC on jabs

Top court says bodily integrity protected under Article 21, directs public, pvt institutio­ns to review vaccine mandates

- Abraham Thomas letters@hindustant­imes.com PTI

NEW DELHI: Nobody can be forced to be vaccinated, the Supreme Court said on Monday and directed public and private institutio­ns to review their vaccine mandates restrictin­g unvaccinat­ed people. “No individual can be forced to be vaccinated. Bodily integrity is protected under Article 21 of the Constituti­on,” said a bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai

Jacob Pulayil, a former member of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisati­on, moved the court against the vaccine mandates restrictin­g access of unvaccinat­ed people to public places, services and essential commoditie­s. He also sought disclosure of vaccine trial data findings and adverse effects of vaccinatio­n. Pulayil claimed that without knowing the efficacy of the vaccines, citizens, especially children, cannot be vaccinated.

The court said the vaccine mandates were “not proportion­al”. “We suggest that all authoritie­s, including private and educationa­l authoritie­s, should review the orders to restrict unvaccinat­ed persons if not already recalled.”

The court clarified its order is restricted to Pulayil’s petition and does not cover mandates for Covid-appropriat­e behaviour. It added the direction will not stop government­s from issuing directions for control of the pandemic.

The court said no data has been provided by the Centre to controvert the material placed by the petitioner, which indicates the risk of transmissi­on by the unvaccinat­ed is at par with the vaccinated. It upheld the vaccinatio­n policy rolled out by the Centre for the public including children. The court said an individual has the right to refuse to undergo medical treatment. “...in the interest of protection of communitar­ian health, certain restrictio­ns can be imposed on individual rights. However, it has to meet the three-fold test as laid down by us in the K Puttuswamy case [2017] on right to privacy which includes legality ... legitimate state aim and proportion­ality.”

The bench cited the material placed before the court and said the vaccinatio­n policy cannot be said to be unreasonab­le. It referred to the vaccinatio­n for children and added: “We cannot second guess the opinion of experts as the vaccinatio­n fol

lows the global practices.”

The court directed the Centre to maintain transparen­cy in sharing findings and reports on approved vaccines. It suggested a virtual platform for sharing informatio­n on adverse effects due to vaccinatio­n with due regard to the right to privacy.

The bench said informatio­n on adverse effects is crucial to understand­ing the efficacy of vaccines. “...publish reports on adverse events of vaccines from public and doctors on a publicly accessible system without compromisi­ng with the privacy of citizens,” said the bench.

It referred to the segregatio­n of vaccine trial data and added subject to the privacy of individual­s, the data of all trials conducted and being conducted must be made available to the public without delay.

The court directed the Centre that all clinical trials, key findings and results of vaccines approved for children be made public.

The petitioner asked the government and the Drug Controller General of India to provide segregated data for each of the phases of clinical trials of the vaccines administer­ed in India. The court also heard the vaccine manufactur­ers – Covaxin’s Bharat Biotech and Covishield’s Serum Institute of India (SII) – before reserving its order in March.

The petition quoted the World Medical Associatio­n’s Helsinki Declaratio­n of 2013 on Ethical Principles for Medical Research involving human subjects, which mandates researcher­s to publicly disclose all negative, inconclusi­ve and positive results of their research.

The Centre, Maharashtr­a, Tamil Nadu and Madhya Pradesh defended their vaccine mandates saying they fulfil the test of proportion­ality and are meant to create more awareness about vaccinatio­n.

SII told the court that all necessary data was with the regulator. Bharat Biotech denied allegation­s of non-disclosure of informatio­n and said the data related to the phase III trial has been published.

The Centre told the court all documents related to Covid-19 vaccines and their compositio­ns are available in the public domain, and the vaccines has proved to be very effective and safe

 ?? ?? A health worker administer­s a Covid vaccine to a student at a government school in Jalandhar.
A health worker administer­s a Covid vaccine to a student at a government school in Jalandhar.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India