Hindustan Times (Gurugram)

Activists hail SC’s order on CJI office

UNDER RTI Ex-info commission­er says unfortunat­e that it took 10 yrs

- letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEWDELHI: Transparen­cy activists on Wednesday welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision on bringing the office of the Chief Justice of India under the ambit of the Right to Informatio­n Act, saying that the apex court has reiterated the establishe­d position in law in the matter.

“I welcome the decision of the constituti­on bench to reiterate the establishe­d position in law that the CJI is a public authority under the RTI Act,” said Venkatesh Nayak, head of access to informatio­n programme, Commonweal­th Human Rights Initiative, an NGO.

In a landmark verdict, a bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi upheld the 2010 Delhi High Court verdict that the office of the Chief Justice of India comes within the ambit of the RTI law and dismissed the three appeals filed by Secretary General of the Supreme Court and the Central Public Informatio­n Officer of the apex court. The top court said that only names of judges recommende­d by the Collegium for appointmen­t can be disclosed, not the reasons.

Cautioning that RTI cannot be used as a tool of surveillan­ce, it held that judicial independen­ce has to be kept in mind while dealing with transparen­cy.

On court’s remark that RTI cannot be used as a tool of surveillan­ce, Nayak said: “It is extremely unfortunat­e that an observatio­n has been made that RTI can be a tool for surveillan­ce on the judiciary. Surveillan­ce has unfortunat­ely been equated with transparen­cy that is required under a law duly passed by Parliament.”

Former informatio­n commission­er Shailesh Gandhi also hailed the decision. “It is a very good decision of the SC... It is unfortunat­e that it has taken 10 years. The CIC has upheld this. Delhi HC had also upheld this. Now, the SC has upheld this. You need to be accountabl­e for your work... ”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India