Reshuffle exposes BJP’s lack of bench strength
Though PM entrusts some junior ministers with independent portfolios, the rest of the rejig mainly underlines minimal options
If a sub-par performance was what prompted the PM to go for a Cabinet revamp, then the expanded Team Modi only exposes a lack of leaders who can rise to ministerial roles.
NEW DELHI: If a below-par performance of his colleagues was what prompted the Prime Minister to go for a Cabinet revamp on Tuesday, then the expanded Team Modi only exposes a lack of bench strength in the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
True, Narendra Modi entrusted some junior ministers with independent charge of portfolios and brought in a river conservationist with strong RSS links, Anil Madhav Dave, as environment minister but the rest of the rejig underlines minimal options.
For instance, Ravishankar Prasad has now been given back the law ministry, 19 months after he was shifted out of it. An accomplished lawyer, he had lost the portfolio in November 2014, barely six months after assuming charge. Today, Prasad also holds charge of Electronics & IT.
Choudhury Birendra Singh has been removed as rural development minister ostensibly for his uninspiring performance. He will now take care of steel, a sector which is reeling under a crisis. Narendra Singh Tomar, who had a rather forgettable tenure as steel minister, has been given charge of the crucial rural development ministry.
The biggest surprise, though, was Smriti Irani’s removal from the human resource development ministry, which has now been entrusted with Prakash Javadekar. Many conspiracy theories float about as reasons. If her unsatisfactory performance as HRD minister was one, then her shift to the ministry of textiles is curious given the government’s thrust on the sector. It recently announced a special `6,000-crore package for the textile and apparel sector, aiming to create one crore jobs in the next three years.
Modi’s intent was clear: thumbs down to headline-hunters and those with a penchant for controversies. It is another matter that the NDA government had, on the occasion of its second anniversary in May, made tall claims of significant achievements in every sector.
If loud disputes were apparently what triggered Irani’s exit from the HRD, then her successor had an equally issues-riddled tenure as environment minister. Questions were raised about Javadekar’s almost 100 per cent clearance of projects in forest areas.
On Wednesday, the HRD minister spoke of his credentials in the new role, recalling his participation in the 1970s students’ movement led by socialist leader Jayaprakash Narayan.
Evidently, politics, and not governance, was the primary consideration behind the selection of the new ministers. It was BJP president Amit Shah, and not the PM, who called up the 19 lucky MPs on Tuesday. Even during the UPA regime, which was criticised for its “dual power centre”, it was PM Manmohan Singh who made the telephone call, and not always in the presence of the Congress president.
Among Modi’s new ministers, five are Dalits and two tribals — a clear indication of the BJP’s outreach to these communities. With the addition of three ministers from election-bound Uttar Pradesh, the state’s representation in the union council of ministers has gone up to 15. Uttarakhand, another state going to polls early next year, also found representation in the ministry with the induction of Dalit leader Ajay Tamta.
Besides, despite clear allocation of work to junior ministers in the Modi government, there are very few cabinet ministers like Arun Jaitley and Suresh Prabhu who involve their deputies in the decision-making process. Minister of state for urban development Babul Supriyo, for instance, is often asked by his boss, Venkaiah Naidu, to sing at official meetings. Little is known about the official work of the Bengali musician of Kaho Na Pyar Hai fame.
The contributions of many other junior ministers have been paltry, at best.