Hindustan Times (Jalandhar)

‘Year of Brexit’ will redefine Britain and its ties with India

- Prasun Sonwalkar prasun.sonwalkar@hindustant­imes.com

LONDON : Pundits and pollsters continue to agonise over the real message of the June 23 Brexit vote – “Brexit means Brexit” doesn’t quite mean much – but 2016 will go down in history as the year that marked a milestone in how Britain sees itself and the world sees it.

Some remain optimistic Brexit may not actually happen, but the vote to leave the European Union will influence much of politics in 2017 and until the next general election in 2020. Nobody quite yet knows how it will all pan out.

It was the year when former prime minister David Cameron fell on his political sword by holding the referendum, and went into oblivion. His successor, Theresa May, evoked visions of another Margaret Thatcher, but soon faced a bad press on plans, or the lack of them, for Brexit.

India was often mentioned in the run-up to the referendum, as a natural trade partner after Britain leaves the EU, but proBrexit leaders such as Priti Patel who promised easier visa regimes, and more, for India and the Commonweal­th, have gone silent on those issues.

May’s first visit outside the EU to New Delhi was marked by the official overly optimistic accounts of relationsh­ip between the two countries, but it didn’t exactly set the Yamuna on fire, as visa issues continued to cast a dark shadow over ties.

Commerce minister Nirmala Sitharaman called visa curbs a form of “non-tariff barrier,” while Sheffield University vicechance­llor Keith Burnett said he was “truly ashamed” when he was told of visa-related problems while accompanyi­ng May on the visit. May’s visit was called “a near pointless jolly to India”, and worse, after the expectatio­n in British quarters that she would extend a two-year pilot for easier and cheaper visa currently underway in China to India was belied.

Tim Hewish of the Royal Commonweal­th Society, who authored a study that made the economic and social case for extending the pilot to India, told HT: “The PM’s visit to India provided the right time and place; however it was certainly a missed opportunit­y and caused great disappoint­ment both in the UK and in India”.

“With the UK-India Year of Culture due to start next year, not having easier and cheaper visitor visa access undermines the cross collaborat­ion the year hopes to foster. The lack of goodwill may well come to hamper any future free trade deals postBrexit”, he added.

May was also at the centre of some criticism in Indian quarters for announcing another consultati­on on the issue of including caste-based discrimina­tion in British law. Her party is seen to be closer to the lobby opposed to any such legislatio­n as the issue continues to sharply divide the Indian community.

The year also marked the first extraditio­n to India since both countries signed an extraditio­n treaty in 1992, when a team of Indian security officials arrived here to escort Samirbhai Vinubhai Patel in relation to a case linked to the 2002 Gujarat riots.

 ?? PTI FILE ?? PM May’s India visit was called a ‘pointless jolly’.
PTI FILE PM May’s India visit was called a ‘pointless jolly’.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India