The problem is not just in the SC
Judicial vacancies must be filled soon to speed up justice delivery
TAs the head Justice of he India’s happen the Supreme Dipak Supreme strength 13 top on (7 Misra time, court more Court Court’s of the faces judges has (SC) 31, gap 25 and collegium, the is could are judges staring if set appointments swell to against at retire a to severe an this the unprecedented do crisis: year). sanctioned not tough judges challenge to and have sending differences of finalising them for with approval names the judiciary of to the Centre, over finalising which continues of a new SC and Memorandum high courts. The of Procedure stand-off between (MoP) to the appoint judiciary judges and to Centre the over the appointments of judges has persisted since October 2015 when a five-judge Constitution Bench struck down the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, which gave the executive a say in judicial appointments. The apex court had asked the government to prepare a new MoP in consultation with its collegium. The Centre is keen for a clause in the MoP, which will give it veto power to reject the collegium’s recommendation on the grounds of national security. The seven SC judges set to retire this year include the Chief Justice of India and three who are also members of the collegium — Justices J Chelameswar, MB Lokur and Kurian Joseph — which means in 2018 the top court’s collegium will also witness an overhaul.
Studies show that India has only 18 judges for every million people, while in the US the judge-to-population ratio is 107 judges for the same number of people. The number of vacancies for judges in the high courts (HCs) stands at 400. There is a shortfall of 5,000 judges in district courts. Soon after he became the CJI, Justice Misra made a concerted effort to clear the backlog of cases in SC and reduced the pendency to below 60,000. A similar resolute approach is required to fill up the vacancies in SC and appoint chief juctices to HCs before he retires in October 2018.
The inordinate delay in deciding on cases is one way in which litigants are denied not justice, but even access to justice. It is also time for the government and judiciary to sort out their lingering disagreement on the MoP.