Will HUL’s GST provision set precedent for others?

MUMBAI: Hindustan Unilever Ltd’s decision to set aside money to compensate consumers for excess tax charged by it has set a precedent for other companies.

India’s largest packaged consumer goods maker earmarked ₹119 crore in the December quarter to be paid to the government because it could not immediately lower prices after the goods and services tax (GST) on several products was reduced on November 15.

The company has offered to release the money to the Consumer Welfare Fund, run by the department of consumer affairs.

HUL received a notice for alleged profiteering this week, PTI reported on Tuesday. The government has set up an antiprofiteering authority to ensure that tax cuts are passed on to consumers and the benefits are not quietly pocketed by companies.

Other large companies are now considering making similar provisions as HUL because they were unable to cut prices immediately following the GST reductions, tax experts say.

“What HUL made as a provithis sion is more from an audit perspective to make sure they do not show this money as profit but as payment to be made to the government,” said Anita Rastogi, partner at auditor PwC India.

Under GST rules, the central government notified in June last year that any excess profit a manufacturer makes by charging a higher price should be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund. But there is little clarity on how this transfer should happen and under what circumstances.

“If money is collected (by a company as profit) without passing on the tax benefits, then it will go to the consumer, and if not possible, then the Consumer Welfare Fund,” Sachin Menon, partner and head, indirect tax, at auditor KPMG, said in an interview. “However, guidelines governing are yet to be issued.”

“Actions were initiated immediately but it takes time,” Srinivas Phatak, chief financial officer at HUL, said on Wednesday at a briefing on the company’s December quarter earnings. “There are pipeline stocks. We advised modern trade retailers to pass on the rate reductions, and these were passed very quickly.”

HUL is now waiting for instructions from the government on what to do with the money it has set aside.

Given the ambiguity in antiprofiteering rules, HUL said it decided to be proactive and voluntarily declared to the Central Board of Excise and Customs that it estimated ₹119 crore worth of benefits should have gone to its consumers. Other companies may do the same.

“HUL has said that it was not able to pass on all benefits immediately, so other companies would have faced the same issue,” Rastogi said. Most large packaged consumer goods makers, and other companies as well “have started to hold board meetings to figure out how to deal with this situation before the DGS (Directorate General of Safeguards) issues them a notice.”

HUL HAS DECIDED TO VOLUNTARILY DECLARE TO THE CBDT THAT AN ESTIMATED ₹119 CR WORTH OF BENEFITS NEEDED TO GO TO CONSUMERS