Hindustan Times (Jalandhar)

Case takes new turn after Sandhu’s allegation­s

- Ravinder Vasudeva ravinder.vasudeva@hindustant­imes.com

The accusation of former vigilance bureau (VB) SSP Kanwarjit Singh Sandhu, complainan­t in the Ludhiana City Centre scam, that chief minister Captain Amarinder Singh and former chief minister Parkash Singh Badal colluded to settle the cases against each other, has once again brought to the fore the multicrore scam that kept on rocking the state politics for over a decade. The case has taken an interestin­g turn even after the VB had filed a closure report after fighting it for more than ten years. Hindustan Times takes a re-look at the entire case:

WHAT IS THE SCAM?

During its previous term in 2002-2007, the Captain Amarinder Singh government envisaged Rs 1,144-crore project to develop a multiplex, a mall, leisure parks and other commercial hubs with a rooftop helipad on Pakhowal Road of Ludhiana. As per the FIR registered by VB in 2007, Amarinder and the other accused allegedly favoured a Delhi-based company ‘Today Homes’ in executing the real estate project by violating norms in 2003.

WHO ARE THE ACCUSED AND WHAT ARE THE CHARGES?

The bureau had registered a case in April 2007 against 36 persons, including Amarinder, his son Raninder Singh and son-in-law Raminder Singh, then local bodies minister late Chaudhary Jagjit Singh, former Punjab Congress chief HS Hanspal, then Ludhiana Improvemen­t Trust late chairman Paramjit Singh Sibia and many senior officials. They were booked under various sections of the IPC relating to criminal breach of trust (409), cheating (420), forgery (465), forgery of valuable security (467), forgery for purpose of cheating (468), and using as genuine a forged document (471), criminal conspiracy (120-B), besides the relevant sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

WHAT IMPACT DID IT MAKE ON STATE POLITICS?

The scam was one of the biggest issues that opposition SAD-BJP exploited to grab power in 2007. The case kept on troubling Amarinder during the SADBJP’s tenure between 2007 and 2012. As former Punjab DGP Sumedh Saini was the head of the VB at that time, the case kept on hounding Amarinder, with VB vigorously arguing in the court against Amarinder and the other accused. However, in the second tenure of the SADBJP between 2007 and 2012, the files of the case fell silent.

HOW DID THE CASE PROCEED?

The case saw various twists and turns ever since VB registered the case. Amarinder and the other accused regularly appeared before the court in Ludhiana but the matter was repeatedly adjourned. The VB had listed 152 witnesses in the case.

WHEN THE VB FILED CLOSURE REPORT IN THE CASE?

It was in August 2017 when VB filed a closure report in the case citing that there was no evidence against Amarinder and the other accused. Incumbent DGP Suresh Arora was chief director, VB, when the closure report was filed in the case.

CAPT AND OTHER ACCUSED HAD ‘FAVOURED’ A DELHIBASED COMPANY IN EXECUTING THE REAL ESTATE PROJECT BY VIOLATING NORMS IN 2003

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India