Hindustan Times (Jalandhar)

Build a society that respects individual choice

- NAMITA BHANDARE Namita Bhandare writes on gender The views expressed are personal

K’ s parents prided themselves on being educated and liberal and yet, when he told them he was gay, he remembers his mother saying: “You don’t have to flaunt it. After all we do live in society.” K is one of the lucky ones, unlike the many, who, when they come out to their families, are dragged off to psychiatri­sts, counsellor­s, godmen and sundry quacks for a “cure”.

The suicide of a woman from Kerala has ignited conversati­on on this so-called “conversion

therapy”. There is talk of legal options in some activist circles. An online petition wants mental health practition­ers to pledge support to LGBTQI+ people. Four different profession­al organisati­ons such as the Centre for Mental Health Law & Policy have issued statements debunking it.

Conversion therapy has “absolutely no scientific basis,” says Vikram Patel, psychiatri­st and professor of global health at Harvard Medical School. “It has been prohibited by every major psychiatri­c associatio­n in the world, including India.”

And, yet, it persists, often with tragic consequenc­es. “I’ve heard some heart-rending stories,” says Rafiul Rahman, founder of the Queer Muslim Project. Stories where individual­s are subject to a range of often-violent interventi­ons from medication, electrocon­vulsive therapy, forced institutio­nalisation and even exorcism. “It distorts your idea of self and leaves a scar,” says Rahman.

The therapy continues because there is a demand for it. Families, influenced by religious prohibitio­n on same sex relationsh­ips, buy into ideas of what is “normal”. Also, the thought that a child might have autonomy in sexual choice flies in the face of parental authority. But, says Patel, “You cannot change someone’s fundamenta­l nature or their fundamenta­l right to be who they are.”

It’s an idea reflected in two Supreme Court judgments. Both Nalsa, which granted legal recognitio­n to transgende­rs, and Section 377, which decriminal­ised same-sex relations, and affirmed the right of citizens to live with human dignity.

“Conversion therapy goes against the grain of the 377 judgment,” says Saurabh

Kirpal, one of the lawyers in the petition. “It amounts to physical and psychologi­cal torture and negates the humanity of individual­s by rejecting their sexual choices.”

In 2018, the Indian Psychiatri­c Associatio­n clarified that homosexual­ity is not a mental illness but stopped short of calling for an explicit ban on conversion therapy. Doctors who practise it face no action. But, says Patel: “If doctors choose to not follow science, they should lose their licence.”

Perhaps we need more centres like the Mariwala Health Initiative that teaches queer affirmativ­e counsellin­g to mental health profession­als. Says its director Raj Mariwala: “There’s a much wider work that needs to be done if we are to be truly inclusive.” Demonising doctors and families who force individual­s to undergo conversion therapy is the easy bit. The far harder part is the work that must go into building an affirmativ­e society that is respectful of individual choice. It’s an effort where we all — media, profession­als, entertaine­rs, teachers — can play a role in writing a new script.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India