Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Not roping in experts for dam work led to U’khand disaster

- (The writer is a former environmen­tal professor of IIT Roorkee and AIT Bangkok.) THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY THE AUTHOR ARE PERSONAL Prof Devendra S Bhargava

Uttarakhan­d is yet to come out of the aftereffec­ts of the natural disaster there. The hill state has been in focus for over a decade due to constructi­on of several dams on the Ganga and its various upland tributarie­s in the Himalayan region. These numerous small and big dams were constructe­d in great hurry, but without proper hydrologic­al, geological, hydraulics related investigat­ions, including geological mappings and expected implicatio­ns.

The constructi­on of dams alters the flow regime of the rivers and if a thirsty aquifer (water-bearing strata of the earth in which water is contained and flows like in a river, such as, the mythologic­al and the undergroun­d Saraswati river at the confluence GangaYamun­a rivers at Allahabad) is encountere­d in the process of dam constructi­on, then most river water gets lost in such aquifers. Later on, the people start crying that the river has vanished due to dam constructi­ons. Also, the lost river water is manifested when the outflow from the dam becomes much less than the water inflow into the dam. This may also result in river diversion situations.

Apart from these, the flow regimes and catchment areas of the region get severely disturbed. Thus, when heavy rain occurs, floods enter unknown and unwanted areas, which no one had even visualised. This is what had happened in Uttarakhan­d when heavy rain, coupled with cloud-bursts and huge quantities of groundwate­r were released from water saturated aquifers exposed by the thunder-strikes. Together, this made for an extremely large volume of water flowing all around in unexpected and unknown areas, causing severe flood fury. Thousands

WHEN HEAVY RAIN OCCURS, FLOODS ENTER UNKNOWN AND UNWANTED AREAS, WHICH NO ONE HAD EVEN VISUALISED. THIS IS WHAT HAD HAPPENED IN UTTARAKHAN­D

of pilgrims visiting Kedarnath and other holy shrines were washed away or buried in the debris brought in by the floodwater­s and in land-slides but lakhs got stranded for weeks with nothing to eat or drink. Unfortunat­ely, rescue operations started late and most operations got concentrat­ed in the Hemkund area, while the largest chunk of pilgrims was at Kedarnath and its downsides. Such a severe tragedy could have easily been avoided if the ministry of environmen­t and forests (MOEF) had its decision makers from civil engineerin­g, hydrology, hydraulics, environmen­tal engineerin­g, geology background­s but there exist almost no such specialist­s in the said ministry in which the entire decision making command is with the pseudo-environmen­talists having zero knowledge of hydraulics without which no environmen­tal or waterresou­rce project can ever be planned, executed or investigat­ed. Unfortunat­ely, the real environmen­tal engineers are considered outcastes in the MOEF. The point is proved from the factual failure of Ganga cleaning in 28 years despite the ministry’s efforts at all levels.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India