Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Modi should be flexible towards Pakistan

Tough talk by the BJP’s prime ministeria­l candidate must give way to accommodat­ive postures

- Razeshta Sethna Razeshta Sethna is a journalist with the Dawn Media Group in Karachi The views expressed by the author are personal

As the BJP remains the front-runner in India’s election with prime ministeria­l candidate Narendra Modi recast as an economic reformer, neighbouri­ng Pakistan is waiting in the wings. For more than a decade since it first gained power, the BJP has shared a chilly relationsh­ip with Pakistan, followed by periods of rapprochem­ent.

Pakistan is now curious about Modi’s ambiguity over lingering issues — terrorism, trade, the nuclear doctrine, Afghanista­n and Kashmir. In a sense, the outcome of the election will be crucial in shaping bilateral ties after the composite dialogue took a beating.

Revising the ‘no-first-use’ policy introduced in 1999 is posturing in the run-up to the vote, pointedly warning nuclear neighbours that India has enough muscles to flex, if in a pre-emptive mood. With the unresolved Kashmir conflict and the existence of militant sanctuarie­s on the Af-Pak border, shifts in India’s nuclear doctrine could signal further provocatio­n towards Pakistan and China.

If elected, Modi will be tough on terrorism and national security, but shares his interest in exploiting global economic openings with his Pakistani counterpar­t, Nawaz Sharif. Fixing the economy could draw agreement on liberalisi­ng trade and visa policies, permitting viable regional trade opportunit­ies to ease political tensions.

Pakistan’s recent backtracki­ng on granting India the status of most favoured nation (MFN) is not a conciliato­ry signal, having irked Indian investors and businesses. When the Pakistani military’s strategic paradigm went through small changes last year, for the first time General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani acknowledg­ed the main threat facing the country was internal extremism, and not India.

Self-assured hawks must note warring democracie­s in South Asia will fail. China and India have the world’s largest trade relationsh­ip, with trade between the two countries reaching $49.5 billion last year. This makes India hardly reliant on Pakistani exports. But what India wants will count and Modi will have little choice but to pursue confidence-building measures, if pressured by his constituen­ts trading with Pakistan.

Not only is Modi’s leadership and bellicose personalit­y unlike that of AB Vajpayee — a poet who travelled twice to Pakistan in his six-year prime ministeria­l tenure; initiated the India-Pak bus diplomacy and signed a 1999 peace declaratio­n in Lahore — but his political trajectory has Muslims uneasy.

If his trademark anti-Muslim rhetoric and non-apologetic stance over the 2002 Gujarat riots was not enough for anti-BJP sceptics (for which he was denied a visa to the US), Modi’s aggressive accusation­s against Arvind Kejriwal, reprimandi­ng him and the Congress’ AK Antony for taking a pro-Pakistan approach, remind one of his trademark inflammato­ry rhetoric.

With a tumultuous history, the BJPPakista­n relationsh­ip (March 1998 to May 2004) has renewable ability for war. The increased spectre of regional terror could destabilis­e ties with the slightest noise. The Pakistani Taliban are not interested in talking peace with Sharif ’s chosen few and should they feel the need to derail dialogue with a hard-line nationalis­t Indian partner, it would put the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) in the doghouse.

What could become worrying for Sharif is that Modi might have little accommodat­ion and patience for playing soft ball, with “zero tolerance towards terrorism” and Pakistan-backed terror groups. Will he demand that Pakistan revisit the Mumbai attacks and apprehend the planners as a prerequisi­te to trade ties and peace talks? Sharif wants a third-party mediator on Kashmir: Would Modi agree?

For Modi, war-mongering might not be an option as the leader of the world’s largest democracy. The election narrative does not sum up Modi’s action plan entirely because geopolitic­al shifts require the BJP to change tack as it finds renewing bilateral relations testing (with new Indian nationalis­m) yet mandatory for economic security and global approval. Rajmohan Gandhi used the words “healing”, “reconcilia­tion”, and “understand­ing” when asked about India-Pakistan relations in Karachi this year. “For tomorrow’s sake, can we learn from yesterday?” the grandson of Mahatma Gandhi writes. Would Modi listen?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India