Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

50% WILDLIFE WIPED OUT SINCE 1970

WWF REPORT BLAMES LOSS OF HABITAT, CLIMATE CHANGE

- Reuters

GENEVA: The world population­s of fish, birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles fell overall by 52% between 1970 and 2010, far faster than previously thought, the World Wildlife Fund said on Tuesday.

The conservati­on group’s Living Planet Report, published every two years, said humankind’s demands were now 50% more than nature can bear, with trees being felled, groundwate­r pumped and carbon dioxide emitted faster than Earth can recover.

“This damage is not inevitable but a consequenc­e of the way we choose to live,” Ken Norris, Director of Science at the Zoological Society of London, said.

However, there was still hope if politician­s and businesses took the right action to protect nature, the report said.

“It is essential that we seize the opportunit­y — while we still can — to develop sustainabl­y and create a future where people can live and prosper in harmony with nature,” said WWF Internatio­nal Director General Marco Lambertini.

The report’s finding on the population­s of vertebrate wildlife found that the biggest declines were in tropical regions, especially Latin America. The WWF’s so-called “Living Planet Index” is based on trends in 10,380 population­s of 3,038 mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian and fish species.

The main reasons for declining population­s were the loss of natural habitats, exploitati­on through hunting or fishing, and climate change. To gauge the variations between different countries’ environmen­tal impact, the report measured how big an “ecological footprint” each one had and how much productive land and water area, or “biocapacit­y”, each country accounted for. Kuwaitis had the biggest ecological footprint, meaning they consume and waste more resources per head than any other nation, the report said, followed by Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

Many poorer countries — including India, Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Congo — had an ecological footprint that was well within the planet’s ability to absorb their demands.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India