Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Board votes for superficia­l change

BCCI SGM Officials want secretary to approach Supreme Court and highlight the anomalies in the Lodha Committee recommenda­tions

- Sai Prasad Mohapatra sportsdesk@hindustant­imes.com

MUMBAI: After nearly two months, the Indian cricket board has decided to express its reservatio­ns over the implementa­tion of recommenda­tions of the Supreme Courtappoi­nted Lodha Committee.

The BC CI, which has been maintainin­g that it had an obligation to implement the Committee’ s recommenda­tions and fully respected the directives of the apex court during the special general meeting (SGM) here on Friday, gave the mandate to BCCI’s secretary to file an affidavit in the Supreme Court highlighti­ng the anomalies in the recommenda­tions that the BCCI feels need a relook.

The SGM was held in preparatio­n of March 3, the date by which the BCCI is supposed to let the Supreme Court know about the implementa­tion of all the recommenda­tions of the Committee. “If you have any difficulty in implementi­ng it, we will have the Lodha Committee implement it for you,” Justice Thakur had told the BCCI counsel at the last hearing.

“The members authorised the honorary secretary of the board to file an affidavit in the Supreme Court on behalf of the BCCI pointing out the anomalies and difficulti­es encountere­d in implementa­tion of the Justice Lodha Committee’s recommenda­tions,” said a BCCI release.

It is learnt that the BCCI has decided to file the affidavit before March 3 with the state associatio­ns expected to play a supporting role, with the board giving them the liberty to file affidavits independen­tly.

On Friday, the BCCI members didn’t make the list of their concerns public, which they consider as stumbling blocks in the full implementa­tion of the Lodha panel recommenda­tions.

Except for the press release, which stated that the members had authorised the BCCI secretary to file an affidavit, the BCCI has adopted a wait-and-watch policy till the matter is disposed of through legal remedy. The BCCI also does not want to antagonise the apex court by making public statements.

The BCCI has serious reservatio­ns about the recommenda­tions pertaining to the eligibilit­y of office-bearers, dissolving the associatio­ns and bringing in ‘one state, one vote’ policy and not holding positions

simultane- ously in both the state and national body, as in the case of board secretary Anurag Thakur, treasurer Aniruddh Chaudhary and joint secretary Amitabh Chaudhary.

The most important issue is about having advertisem­ent breaks only during lunch and tea in internatio­nal matches which will lead to the BCCI losing approximat­ely R1500 crore in revenue generated from TV rights. It is something which will seriously affect the board’s coffers.

Meanwhile, in a bid to impress the Supreme Court, the BCCI has decided to set in motion the process of hiring a CEO and CFO.

Being one of the reforms suggested by the court-appointed panel, the BCCI’s working committee authorised the president and honorary secretary to appoint an agency to search for suitable candidates for these posts.

 ?? HT PHOTO ?? Sourav Ganguly is one of the few cricketers involved in administra­tion.
HT PHOTO Sourav Ganguly is one of the few cricketers involved in administra­tion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India