Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

US pull-out: It’s advantage Taliban

Stability in Afghanista­n is vital for India. We need a foolproof strategy to counter the militant group

- GURMEET KANWAL Gurmeet Kanwal is former director, Centre for Land Warfare Studies, New Delhi The views expressed are personal

President Donald Trump declared victory against the ISIS in December 2018 and decided to withdraw all US forces from Syria. He also announced that the US would withdraw half the troops from Afghanista­n in about two months. Both decisions contravene carefully formulated strategies to defeat the Islamic State, al-Qaeda and the Afghan Taliban. In Afghanista­n, in particular, Trump has unwittingl­y handed over the initiative to the Taliban.

After vacillatin­g for over six months, the US President announced his administra­tion’s policy for the resolution of the conflict in Afghanista­n in August 2017 as part of his strategy for South Asia. Contrary to his campaign promise to pull out, he pledged continuing US support for diplomatic, military and financial commitment to peace and stability and political reconcilia­tion.

In a major departure from the policies of the Obama administra­tion, Trump invited India to help the US to work towards conflict resolution in Afghanista­n. As was widely anticipate­d, Trump put Pakistan on notice for encouragin­g terrorist organisati­ons to destabilis­e neighbouri­ng countries and warned the country that “it has much to lose by continuing to harbour criminals and terrorists”. But despite immense American pressure, Pakistan’s ISI has continued to support several factions of the Afghan Taliban and provide them safe havens.

The present situation in Afghanista­n can be described as a strategic stalemate. The Afghan National Army (ANA), supported by the US-led Internatio­nal Security Assistance Force (ISAF), is not losing but the resurgent Taliban now controls about one-third of the country. While the ANA controls most of the large towns, the writ of the Taliban runs in huge areas of the countrysid­e. One estimate suggests the direct war-related casualties number 111,000 dead and 116,000 wounded in the last two decades.

The Taliban continues to haunt government forces. Sporadic strikes by terrorists belonging to ISIS Khorasan — the local branch of the ultra-extremist Islamic State — to stoke sectarian conflict by attacking the Shias continue unabated. Governance is weak, crime is rampant and corruption and tax evasion are widespread. The presidenti­al election that was scheduled for April 2019 has been postponed to July 2019.

Till a week back, efforts to find a negotiated end to the conflict had not made much headway. Though there is general agreement that reconcilia­tion negotiatio­ns should be “Afghan-led and Afghan-owned”, the Taliban consistent­ly refused to meet representa­tives of the Afghan government.

A parallel Russian initiative, called the Moscow format, succeeded in bringing together the Taliban and Afghan representa­tives but the Afghans were from the High Peace Council, a “national but non-government institutio­n”.

The reconcilia­tion talks between the US special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad and representa­tives of the Taliban did not see any forward movement because the Taliban negotiator­s were stalling for time. The withdrawal of troops ordered by President Trump further emboldened the Taliban and weakened the Afghan government. One of the Taliban leaders gloated that it has “defeated the world’s lone super power”. The group demanded the withdrawal of all foreign forces without itself making any concession­s and the Trump administra­tion, eager to pull out, has apparently conceded.

Given its geographic­al location on the strategic crossroads to the Central Asian Republics (CARs) and West Asia, a peaceful and stable Afghanista­n is a vital national interest for India. India has not been invited to join ISAF; nor is there any support for military interventi­on in India’s policy community. However, after being kept away from the high table by the George W Bush and Obama administra­tions in deference to Pakistan’s sensibilit­ies, India is now being urged by the Trump administra­tion to do more to help resolve the conflict.

India has invested over $3 billion in reconstruc­tion projects in Afghanista­n, donated four Mi-25 attack helicopter­s, provided training to Afghan military personnel, civilian pilots and administra­tors and has been regularly providing humanitari­an aid and medical supplies. The Indian embassy in Kabul and Indian consulates as well as road constructi­on protection parties of ITBP have been attacked by the Taliban and have suffered a large number of casualties.

Till very recently, the Indian position for conflict resolution was that there should be no negotiatio­ns with the Taliban as it is a terrorist organisati­on. Yet, India sent two former diplomats as unofficial observers to the Moscow conference with the Taliban. India appears to have now accepted that negotiatio­ns for conflict resolution cannot be Afghanled and Afghan-owned without talking to the Taliban leadership.

With the withdrawal of US-led ISAF likely to begin soon, the clichéd Taliban taunt, “You have the watches, but we have the time,” has begun to ring true. The worst case scenario for India would be the Taliban’s return to power in Kabul. If that happens, Pakistan’s ISI would be sure to divert many of the hard core Taliban fighters — of the factions over which it has control — to Kashmir. India’s national interest lies in formulatin­g a comprehens­ive strategy, jointly with the Afghan government, that ensures that a Taliban takeover can be prevented.

 ?? REUTERS ?? The troop withdrawal ordered by Trump has further emboldened the Taliban and weakened the Afghan government
REUTERS The troop withdrawal ordered by Trump has further emboldened the Taliban and weakened the Afghan government
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India