Kovind gives nod to Guj anti-terror law

Cong fears misuse, minister says PM’s dream fulfilled

AHMEDABAD: President Ram Nath Kovind has approved the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GCTOC), Bill, 2015, four years after it was approved by the state assembly, minister of state for home Pradipsinh Jadeja said on Tuesday.

The proposed law allows intercepted audio conversations and confessions to the police to be presented as evidence in a court of law and permits the police to detain a person without bail.

The Gujarat government had in 2003 first proposed a law to check organised crime on the lines of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). The law was rejected twice during the years in power of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA).

In 2015, the Gujarat government revised the draft bill and included terrorism in the proposed law, which was approved by the assembly with a majority vote, a year after Narendra Modi led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government came to power at the Centre.

The proposed law was approved by the President three months after the Parliament approved amendments to Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act,

which allowed the Centre to declare an individual a terrorist.

“The dream of Prime Minister and former Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi for controlling organized crime and terrorism in this border state will now be fulfilled. The president today has cleared the bill,” Jadeja said.

“The GCTOC will help in curbing terrorism, will enhance Gujarat’s security cover at state and national level and will also strengthen the police force,” the minister said.

The law’s controversial section 16 stipulates “a confession made by a person before a police officer not below the rank of superintendent of police (SP)…shall be admissible in the trial of such accused, co-accused, abettor or conspirator.”

Clause 25 provides immunity to the government and police officers for initiating action under the law.

“No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the state government or any officer or authority of the state government for anything which is done in the good faith or intended to be done in pursuance of this Act,” the bill states.

Senior lawyer Sanjay Hedge said that it was for a good reason that confessions before the police had been excluded from evidence admissible before the courts.

“The confession to the police has been upheld by the Supreme Court in cases of terror with stringent safeguards. But still the provisions have been misused,” he said.