Are you still watching?
Reality TV is now 30 years old. The cameras are still rolling; the participants, as eager to squabble, sob, sweat and squirm. But new shows are reworking old tropes. Judges are more encouraging, competitors more relaxed, formats more informative. Even the cameras feel less intrusive. It’s almost as if being nice is finally being recognised as part of the human condition
Don’t blame the kids. When MTV debuted The Real World, 30 years ago, no one knew what they were in for. The music channel was expanding its programming. Perhaps getting seven to eight young people to live together in a Manhattan loft, and filming their lives non-stop, might be interesting?
The young adults bickered, predictably, about chores, personal space and having to share a single landline. But tempers also flared over racism, gay rights, abortion, homelessness, white privilege and Aids. It all hurtled towards a dramatic finale: the gang broke into the production room, only to discover that they weren’t subjects in a documentary, but part of an unscripted soap opera, the first proper reality show.
“Ah to be young, cute, and stupid, and to have too much free time,” ran one scathing review in The Washington Post. It described The Real World as “excruciating torture”. Other reviewers picked on the banal lives of the young people, found the documentary style pretentious: “Who’d watch this?”
Everybody did. The Real World was an instant hit, running from 1992 to 2017 and spawning several spin-offs. It set up a formula for the genre: real people in a stressful situation, personality clashes, surprise challenges, confessions on camera, elimination rounds, petty humiliations and indignities.
Reality shows have thrived in every country since. And 30 years on, the genre has become as hard to define as it is to criticise.
“There are shows we’ll watch but won’t admit to watching,” says Rishi Negi, CEO of Endemol Shine India, which produces Bigg Boss, MasterChef India and The Voice India, among other reality shows. “But the genre is also teaching us new skills, uncovering new talent, telling inspirational stories about people that would have otherwise remained unknown.” Have we been looking at reality shows all wrong?
Tattoos, sharks, magic
If you lived through the 2000s, you’ve seen what reality TV can do. The Kardashians squabbled their way to billion-dollar fortunes. Simon Cowell’s cruel putdowns powered American Idol. Donald Trump began his public career with The Apprentice and became the 45th President of the US.
India, drowning in saas-bahu dramas at the time, embraced the genre. Indian Idol (2004-), was the country’s most-watched show until 2012, as viewers voted en masse, via SMS, to keep their favourite singers. On Bigg Boss (2006-), the sob stories and machinations of semi-famous housemates became so addictive, the Hindi show spawned editions in Kannada, Bengali, Tamil, Telugu, Marathi and Malayalam.
For many viewers, meanwhile, the chance to banter with Amitabh Bachchan was as exciting as the shot at winning lakhs on Kaun Banega Crorepati (2000-). MTV’s Roadies (2003-), with hothead judges and brash motorcyclists, gave young viewers a new template for masculinity. Reality TV meant singing, dancing, makeovers, and being able to withstand the most embarrassment.
Then, somewhere in the last decade, a new playbook emerged. Think of the refreshing sense of bonhomie on MasterChef Australia, which premiered in India in 2009. Or the dignified business pitches and hustles of Shark Tank, which has been airing in the US since 2009. Or how contestants on American Idol and Indian Idol started to cheer each other.
“There’s been a celebratory, positive spin to the real-life stories on screen,” says Aradhana Bhola, managing director at Fremantle India, which produces Indian Idol and India’s Got Talent, among other reality shows. “Talent still shines through. But now, competitors encourage one another, they offer support when families back home don’t.” It’s almost as if being nice was finally recognised as part of the human condition.
The formats expanded, giving reality TV a legitimacy it didn’t enjoy before. Internationally, there are now shows about life in the tattoo business, home renovations, choosing a wedding dress, being a supernatural medium, contests for glass blowing, fashion design and landing a magic show.
Shark Tank India, which premiered late last year, has been a runaway success. The American edition has long been lauded for helping viewers learn the ropes of business, profit-making, equity trading and marketing. Namita Thapar, CEO of Emcure Pharmaceuticals, served as a judge on the India edition and says the show hit India at the perfect time: in the middle of the start-up boom. “It demonstrated how the right mentorship and capital can go a long way to support our start-up ecosystem,” she says. “Every pitch was like a case study in business school, but narrated in Hindi and explained simply.”
Negi of Endemol and Bhola of Fremantle say that many of the song-dance-drama shows that characterised the 2000s continue to do well today because the family tends to watch them together. Newer shows address new aspirations: like dating to find the right match. Fremantle’s The Inventor Challenge appeals to tinkerers who have never had access to labs and mentors. “There’s abundant talent in India, but not enough platforms to discover and showcase it,” Negi says. “This is where reality shows shine.”
The new crop of shows also pushes a different kind of change. It’s typically where the fringe flexes its muscle before entering the mainstream. Drag queen RuPaul did it with RuPaul’s Drag Race (2009-). The outdoor cooking traditions of black communities are highlighted on The American Barbecue Showdown (2020-). The dating show Love on the Spectrum (2019-2021) explored what the search for love looks like among young adults with autism. Indian-American friends in Miami grapple with Indian and American traditions on Family Karma (2020-).
For Thapar, “showing a woman shoulderto-shoulder with men, making business decisions involving crores of rupees without any help or permission was a powerful image, one much needed to bust stereotypes”. There have been LGBT contestants on Bigg Boss Malayalam, “as the viewers are more progressive about sexual minorities,” says Negi.
Up next
The Real World’s 1992 housemates reunited at the New York City loft last year for a special edition of the show. They were calmer, more introspective, supportive. They wondered what the future of reality TV would be.
What indeed? In China, voting-based reality shows offer the public a rare opportunity to participate in a democratic process. But last year, China banned reality shows that promoted “celebrity culture, displays of vulgarity and softened masculinity”, citing that they were “a corruption of national morals”.
Bans can only do so much. “Social media is the extension of the reality TV wave,” says Bhola. Why have a camera crew follow you around when you can livestream yourself? “We haven’t exhausted the vicarious thrill of following real people, real conflicts,” says Negi. “It’s a relief from soap operas and crime thrillers.”
Reality TV teaches new skills, uncovers new talent... we also haven’t exhausted the vicarious thrill of following real people, real conflicts. RISHI NEGI, CEO, Endemol Shine India