Hindustan Times (Patiala)

Haryana govt ordinance challenged on more counts

- HT Correspond­ent letterschd@hindustant­imes.com

CHANDIGARH: Days after the Punjab and Haryana high court stayed the condition of minimum educationa­l qualificat­ion fixed by the Haryana government, a civil rights group has challenged other conditions of August 14 ordinance promulgate­d by the state government for the candidates of Panchayati Raj Institutio­ns (PRIs).

The high court bench of justice SK Mittal and justice MS Chauhan on Monday sought response from the government on the petition filed by People’s Union for Civil Liberties, a nongovernm­ent organisati­on by September 14 whereby all conditions in the ordinance have been challenged.

Apart from fixing the minimum educationa­l qualificat­ions for PRI candidates at 8th standard for scheduled caste (SC) candidates and women and 10th standard for general category candidates, another condition imposed by the government was having a toilet at home. Besides,

HIGH COURT HAS ALREADY STAYED THE CONDITION OF MINIMUM EDUCATIONA­L QUALIFICAT­ION FOR CONTESTANT­S

the government has barred the chargeshee­ted persons and those who have not cleared their electricit­y dues etc.

The ordinance, Haryana Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015, incorporat­ing these changes was promulgate­d by the government on August 14 in section 175 of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994.

“Government had brought these changes without holding any debate on it in the public domain or discussing it in the state assembly which was against democracy,” the petitioner has submitted further arguing that there was no emergency for this ordinance.

“Government is not justified in notifying the impugned ordinance disqualify­ing a majority of voters from the panchayat elections, without there being any data or statistica­l backing for the same, necessitat­ing such action,” the petitioner has argued further stating that the conditions like barring chargeshee­ted persons or those having arrears or not having functional toilets were not there for the candidates for municipal institutio­ns, legislativ­e assemblies and member of Parliament. “Ordinance is violative of Article 19 of the Constituti­on of India. Right to contest election is a fundamenta­l right and is in exercise of the right to freedom of speech and expression as guaranteed under Article 19 ( 1) ( a) of the Constituti­on,” the petitioner has submitted.

It was on August 21 that high court had stayed recently promulgate­d condition in ordinance by the Haryana government fixing educationa­l qualificat­ion for elections for the posts of panches, sarpanches and Zila Parishad members on the petition of a Hisar resident.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India