Hindustan Times (Patiala)

Boardroom battle hits Snapdeal’s funding plan

Company’s valuation main reason for discord; likely to affect sale talks

- Mihir Dalal and Shrutika Verma mihir.d@livemint.com

BENGALURU/NEW DELHI: A rift between investors on the board of directors of Snapdeal has led to the online marketplac­e missing out on at least two desperatel­y needed funding offers over the past six months, three people familiar with the matter said.

The clash is between early and powerful Snapdeal investors, Kalaari Capital and Nexus Venture Partners, on one side, and SoftBank Group Corp, the company’s largest shareholde­r, on the other, the people cited above said. At the heart of the matter is Snapdeal’s valuation in a potential funding round, the people said on condition of anonymity.

The boardroom battle has contribute­d to the crisis at Snapdeal (Jasper Infotech Pvt Ltd), depriving the company of muchneeded cash. Since January, Snapdeal has cut hundreds of jobs, slashed spending on discounts and marketing and seen a sharp drop in monthly sales.

The difference­s between the board members may also complicate a potential sale of Snapdeal. SoftBank has initiated talks with Paytm and Flipkart to sell Snapdeal, Mint reported on March 22. SoftBank may also put up as much as $50 million in cash to tide Snapdeal over until a merger materialis­es, Mint reported then. For such a round to happen, Snapdeal’s other board members may need to be bought out or be convinced to take a large haircut on their investment­s.

Over the past six months, SoftBank has offered to invest at least once in both Snapdeal and its payments unit, Freecharge. The proposed deal would have lowered Snapdeal’s valuation (including Freecharge) to less than half of the $6.5 billion it fetched in its last funding round in February 2016, the people cited above said. But the deal was rejected by Kalaari and Nexus as the valuation drop would have led to a significan­t increase in SoftBank’s stake and a correspond­ing slide in their ownership, the people said.

When SoftBank offered the cut-price deal, Kalaari and Nexus asked the Japanese investor to buy at least part of their shares in the company, the people cited above said.

SoftBank, which has already pumped roughly $900 million into Snapdeal, refused, favouring a direct infusion into the company, the people said.

For Kalaari and Nexus, a lot rides on Snapdeal. It is their biggest bet and generating a lucrative exit from the online marketplac­e could be crucial for the success of the two Indian venture capital firms. That’s why a fall in their Snapdeal stakes could be damaging.

SoftBank owns 33% in Snapdeal, while Nexus owns roughly 10% and Kalaari nearly 8%, according to documents with the Registrar of Companies. Chief executive Kunal Bahl and Rohit Bansal, chief operating officer, who are also co-founders, together own less than 6.5% of the company after cashing out part of their stakes.

Despite their low stakes compared with SoftBank, Kalaari and Nexus, two of the earliest institutio­nal backers of Snapdeal, still enjoy strong shareholde­r rights and have veto powers on board matters. However, they would lose many of their rights if their ownership falls below 4.75%, according to Snapdeal’s articles of associatio­n, which define the terms of governance and management.

Apart from the proposed deal with SoftBank, another funding offer, though at an early stage, was made to Snapdeal in the second half of last year by eBay Inc, a minority investor in Snapdeal. eBay had offered to sell its Indian unit to Snapdeal, the three people cited above said. eBay also offered to put cash into Snapdeal but the company’s board including SoftBank rejected the deal because of difference­s over valuation, the people said.

Snapdeal, SoftBank, Kalaari and Nexus did not respond to emails seeking comment.

 ?? MINT/FILE ?? Snapdeal founder Kunal Bahl and cofounder Rohit Bansal
MINT/FILE Snapdeal founder Kunal Bahl and cofounder Rohit Bansal

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India