Hindustan Times (Patiala)

Delhi riots accused names leaders in statement

- HT Correspond­ent letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: A charge sheet related to the north-east Delhi riots case, filed last month by Delhi police, created a stir on social media on Saturday, after it emerged that one attachment to it has a statement by an accused, claiming that general secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) Sitaram Yechury, Swaraj Abhiyan leader Yogendra Yadav, Delhi University professor Apoorvanan­d, former MLA Chaudhary Mateen and advocate Mahmood Pracha had instigated the protestors.

To be sure, their names do not appear in the charge sheet itself.

Delhi Police moved immediatel­y to clarify that none of these people have been charged.

The unit’s spokespers­on, Anil Mittal said, “Nobody has been charged. We have not even made any recommenda­tion to the court because they are not an accused. The names are part of the disclosure statement of one of the accused in connection with organising and addressing anti-Citizenshi­p Amendment Act protests. The disclosure statement has been truthfully recorded as narrated by the accused person. A person is not arraigned as an accused only on the basis of disclosure statement. However, it is only on the existence of sufficient corroborat­ive evidence does further legal action is taken. The matter is currently sub judice.”

HT has reviewed a copy of the charge sheet. The statement in question was from a person called Gulfisha Khatoon, in which she names people who “fuelled the feeling of discontent among protesters by calling CAA and NRC anti-Muslim...”

Khatoon, a student activist and alleged member of Pinjra Tod, was arrested on July 28 . Police have claimed that members of the women’s collective Pinjra Tod, including Devanga Kalita and Natasha Narwal, orchestrat­ed the riots by mobilising people through their speeches during the anti-Citizenshi­p Amendment Act protests.

Yechury too criticised Delhi Police. He tweeted, “56 people died in the riots. There are videos of people delivering inflammato­ry speeches but police are not taking any action against them. They have clear orders to suppress the oppression. There will be protests against this.”

DU professor Apoorvanan­d said the whole thing is “disappoint­ing because the actual violence is not a concern for the Delhi police”.

We have not even made any recommenda­tion to the court because they are not accused. ANIL MITTAL,

Delhi Police spokespers­on

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India