Hindustan Times (Patiala)

Nine months on, Karnal woman yet to get her child back

- Neeraj Mohan neeraj.mohan@hindustant­imes.com

We were only witness to the adoption. The FIR should be against people who adopted the baby ACCUSED’S DAUGHTER

KARNAL: Nine months on, Karnal woman Jyoti, 28, is running pillar to post to get her son back from a Meerut-based couple, who claimed to have adopted the child on September 14, 2020.

Her husband had left her a few months before their third child was born and Jyoti lives in Kunjpura village of Karnal.

Four-and-a-half-month after she filed a complaint, the Kunjpura police have registered an FIR (on June 15) under Sections 363, 368, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the IPC and Sections 80 and 80 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

Jyoti has alleged that before birth of her child, she had come in contact with Dr DP Shrivastav and his gynaecolog­ist wife Dr Sashibala through a friend for consultati­on.

Four days after his birth at Karnal’s KCGMCH, Dr Shrivastav told her that the baby has respirator­y problems and will get better treatment at their

hospital in Meerut free. They took her signatures on a blank stamp paper and took the baby.

A month later, she reached the couple who refused to return the child and threatened her, she alleged. In February this year, she approached the Karnal police and her complaint was forwarded to protection-cum-prohibitio­n officer Rajni Gupta. Rajni said the doctor couple had taken the child and handed him over to a Meerut-based couple - Vishal and Neha Shrivastav.

“Vishal said he adopted the boy with consent of Jyoti and had agreed to return the boy on June 1. But did not turn up, following which an FIR was registered,” she said. On the delay, Karnal SP Ganga Ram Punia said the FIR was registered after investigat­ion by the protection officer as the accused doctor did not record his statement.

When HT contacted Dr Shrivastav­a on registrati­on of FIR against him and his wife, their daughter responded and said, “We don’t know why the FIR is registered against us. We were only witness to the adoption. The FIR should be registered against people who adopted the baby.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India