Hindustan Times (Ranchi)

Boeing seeking to cut back on physical tests for new aircraft

- Reuters feedback@livemint.com ■

PARIS: Boeing Co. engineers are reducing the scope and duration of certain costly physical tests used to certify the plane-maker’s new aircraft, according to industry officials close with the matter and regulatory officials.

But the strategy could be at risk if regulators and US lawmakers probing two deadly Boeing plane crashes require even more rigorous safety tests before certifying new aircraft as passengerw­orthy.

As Boeing kicks off the yearlong flight testing process on its new 777X, its engineers will cut hours off airborne testing by using computer models to simulate flight conditions, and then present the results to the US Federal Aviation Administra­tion (FAA) as part of the basis for certificat­ion, according to two people with direct knowledge of the strategy. Reuters could not determine when Boeing decided to move forward with the plan to cut back on physical tests or the extent to which it planned to reduce them for the 777X.

For Boeing’s proposed twinaisle jetliner, known internally as NMA, Boeing’s Test & Evaluation group is developing the technology to replace costly and labour intensive physical safety tests used for decades—such as using machines to bend the wings to extreme angles and shaking the fuselage until it cracks—with computer modelling, according to three people with knowledge of the matter, including an FAA official.

Such work for the NMA is in the conceptual phase, though Boeing’s goal is to expand “certificat­ion by analysis” as “extensivel­y as they possibly can” to slash developmen­t costs, one of the people told Reuters. Doing so enhances a finely balanced business case for launching NMA, which would be the first aircraft fully developed in the digital age.

Boeing spokesman Paul Bergman declined to comment on the company’s testing strategy for the 777X or the NMA, but said the plane maker was“looking holistic ally at our design and certificat­ion processes” following the 737 MAX crashes in Ethiopia and Indonesia, which together killed 346 people.

“This includes participat­ing in ongoing independen­t government reviews and establishi­ng a new board committee to review our end-to-end design and certificat­ion processes,” Bergman said.

When asked whether the FAA would allow Boeing to eliminate an array of physical tests for NMA and 777X, FAA spokesman Lynn Lunsford said the agency “makes determinat­ions on a caseby-case basis, relying on data and decades of experience in certifying aircraft”.

Current regulation­s allow planemaker­s to use physical testing and analysis to demonstrat­e compliance.

Like the MAX, the NMA and 777X—which Boeing is racing to deliver in 2020—are centerpiec­es in Boeing’s duel with Airbus SE and will influence how Boeing decides to manufactur­e and certify an eventual 737 MAX replacemen­t. How quickly and at what cost the new planes are delivered to customers is critical to not just Boeing’s bottom line, but also the US Congressio­nal budget.

 ?? REUTERS ?? ■ Boeing spokesman Paul Bergman said the firm was ‘looking holistical­ly at our design and certificat­ion processes’ following the 737 MAX crashes in Ethiopia and Indonesia.
REUTERS ■ Boeing spokesman Paul Bergman said the firm was ‘looking holistical­ly at our design and certificat­ion processes’ following the 737 MAX crashes in Ethiopia and Indonesia.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India