Top UK court rules against Scottish referendum plan

The UK Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that Scotland does not have the power to hold a new referendum on independence without the consent of the British government.

The judgment is a setback for the Scottish government’s campaign to break away from the United Kingdom. The top court ruled that the Scottish parliament “does not have the power to legislate for a referendum on Scottish independence”.

Supreme Court president Robert Reed said the five justices were unanimous in the verdict. The semi-autonomous

Scottish government wants to hold a referendum next October with the question “Should Scotland be an independent country?”

The Conservative UK government in London refuses to approve a vote, saying the question was settled in a 2014 referendum that saw Scottish voters reject independence by a margin of 55% to 45%.

The pro-independence government in Edinburgh wants to revisit the decision, though, arguing that Britain’s departure from the European Union which a majority of Scottish voters opposed - has radically changed the political and economic landscape.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon

argues that she has a democratic mandate from the Scottish people to hold a new secession vote because there is an independence-supporting majority in the Scottish Parliament.

During Supreme Court hearings last month, Dorothy Bain, the Scottish government’s top law officer, said the majority of Scottish lawmakers had been elected on commitments to hold a fresh independence referendum.

UK government lawyer James Eadie argued that power to hold a referendum rests with the UK parliament in London, because “it’s of critical importance to the United Kingdom as a whole”, not just Scotland.