Hindustan Times (Ranchi)

HC CANT BE ‘TOWN PLANNER’: SC ON ANDHRA CAPITAL

-

The Supreme Court on Monday sought responses from farmers and their associatio­ns, and the Centre to a plea by Andhra Pradesh government challengin­g the high court decision which said the state legislatur­e “lacked competence” to make any law for shifting, bifurcatin­g or trifurcati­ng the capital.

The top court observed the Andhra Pradesh HC cannot be a “town planner” and direct the government that the capital city should come up in six months.

The Supreme Court also stayed time-bound directions issued by high court, including one that said the state will develop Amaravati capital city and capital region within six months.

The Supreme Court on Monday sought responses from farmers and their associatio­ns, and the Centre to a plea by the Andhra Pradesh government challengin­g the high court decision which said that the state legislatur­e “lacked competence” to make any law for shifting, bifurcatin­g or trifurcati­ng the capital.

It observed the Andhra Pradesh high court cannot be a “town planner” or an “engineer” and direct the government that the capital city should come up in six months.

A bench of justices KM Joseph and BV Nagarathna also stayed time-bound directions issued by the high court, including the one that said the state will construct and develop Amaravati capital city and capital region within six months.

The high court had also ordered the government and the authoritie­s concerned to complete infrastruc­ture developmen­t like roads, drainage and electricit­y and drinking water supply in the Amaravati Capital City and Region within one month.

The SC bench said it needs to examine the issue at length and posted a batch of petitions filed by the state, farmers, associatio­ns and their committees for further hearing on January 31.

The top court, which asked the parties to file their responses by December, was informed by senior advocate KK Venugopal that the state government has repealed the law for having three different capitals of the State.

On March 3, the high court had said the inaction of the state and Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Developmen­t Authority (APCRDA’s) failure to develop the capital city and capital region as agreed to in terms of the Developmen­t Agreementc­um-Irrevocabl­e General Power of Attorney, is nothing but a deviation from the promise made by the state, defeating legitimate expectatio­n.

It had said the state and the APCRDA violated the fundamenta­l rights of the petitioner­s (farmers), as they surrendere­d their only source of livelihood­over 33,000 acres of fertile land.

The high court had passed its 300-page verdict on a batch of 63 writ petitions filed by aggrieved farmers of Amaravati region against Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy government’s decision to make Visakhapat­nam the Executive Capital, Kurnool the Judiciary Capital and Amaravati as the Legislativ­e Capital of Andhra Pradesh.

Earlier, the tussle between the farmers of Amaravati, the present capital region of Andhra Pradesh, and the Jagan Mohan Reddy government over the proposal to form three capitals for the state had snowballed into a major issue.

In November second week, the ruling YSR Congress Party in Andhra Pradesh, in associatio­n with Joint Action Committee for decentrali­sation, had conducted rallies and human chains in 10 districts across the state in yet another attempt to give push to the proposal of chief minister Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy to create three capitals for the state.

The occasion was to celebrate the 85th anniversar­y of the Sribagh Agreement, which was signed by the leaders of Coastal Andhra and Rayalaseem­a on November 16, 1937, while seeking to separate from the then Madras Presidency.

The agreement called for decentrali­sation of administra­tion while forming a linguistic state for Telugus. After the formation of Andhra as a state in 1953, the then government followed this Sribagh Agreement to locate administra­tive capital at Kurnool and the state high court at Guntur.

“The objective of the programme is to highlight the essence of decentrali­sation, which was the hallmark of the Sribagh Agreement. We are glad that the Jagan Mohan Reddy government has given a new lease of life to this forgotten agreement by proposing three capitals,” JAC convener K V Ramana had said in Anantapur.

 ?? HY ?? The SC bench said it needs to examine the issue at length and posted a batch of petitions filed by the State, farmers, associatio­ns and their committees for further hearing on January 31.
HY The SC bench said it needs to examine the issue at length and posted a batch of petitions filed by the State, farmers, associatio­ns and their committees for further hearing on January 31.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India