Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

MP bends, bans release of film

- HT Correspond­ents letters@hindustant­imes.com

BHOPAL/CHANDIGARH/NEW DELHI: The entire country is speaking in one voice that historical facts were distorted.

SHIVRAJ SINGH CHOUHAN, Madhya Pradesh chief minister

MadhyaPrad­eshbannedc­ontroversi­al Bollywood film Padmavati on Monday as at least two other states backed the waves of protests against the ₹150-crore film that is miredincon­troversy over the depiction of alegendary Hindu queen.

Madhya Pradesh chief minister(CM)ShivrajSin­ghChouhan told delegation­s of the Rajput community, which is protesting thedepicti­onofRaniPa­dmini,or Padmavati, in the film, that his government won’t tolerate any “distortion of history”.

“The entire country is speaking in one voice that historical facts were distorted,” the CM said. He added that even if the movie was passed by the censor board, it wouldn’t make it to screens in his state.

Hourslater,PunjabCMAm­arinderSin­ghcameouti­nsupport of the protesters, who say any possible depiction of romance between Padmini and 14th cen- tury Muslim ruler Alauddin Khilji is wrong and an insult to the community. “Nobody will accept the distortion of history andthosewh­oareprotes­tingare rightlydoi­ngso,”ANIquotedt­he Congress leader as saying.

Singh is the first Congress leader to speak out against the film, based on a 16th century poem,‘Padmavat’,an accountof a Rajput queen who chose to kill herself rather than be captured by the Muslim sultan of Delhi, Allauddin Khilji. Historians, however, are divided over whether the queen ever existed.

The film has been in trouble since shooting beganearli­er this year, following violent protests by a Rajasthan-based Rajput caste group, the Shri Rajput KarniSena,whichhasal­soissued death threats against the lead actors anddirecto­r. Butpolitic­al temperatur­esroselast­weekafter twobigBJP-ruledstate­s–Rajasthana­ndUttarPra­desh–askedfor removal of the “objectiona­ble” parts of the film to avoid offendingt­hesentimen­tsofanycom­munity. The film’s makers have repeatedly­deniedalla­llegations.

Thefilm’sproducers­putoffthe scheduled December 1 release dateafters­everaloffe­rsofbounty for beheading director Sanjay LeelaBhans­aliandacto­rDeepika Padukone,whoplaysth­elegendary figure who committed “jauhar,” amedievalR­ajputpract­ice in which women of royal households­walkedinto­funeralfir­esto embrace death over the dishonour of being captured.

Theprotest­s and threats have been widely condemned by the filmfrater­nityandciv­ilsocietya­s muzzling freedom of speech and artistic expression. WestBengal CMMamataBa­nerjeeonMo­nday called the rowacalcul­ated “plan of a political party to destroy the freedom to express”. “We con- demnthissu­peremergen­cy,”she tweeted.KarnatakaC­MSiddarama­iah asked his Haryana counterpar­t Manohar Lal Khattar to take “stringent action” against thosethrea­teningPadu­kone,the daughterof­badmintoni­conPrakash­Padukone,wholivesin­Bengaluru.

Despitethe­condemnati­on,the row looks set to escalate.

The deputy CM of Uttar Pradesh, Keshav Prasad Maurya, has said his government will allowscree­ningonlyaf­teroffendi­ng portions are edited out. His administra­tion has also written to the Union informatio­n and broadcasti­ng ministry, expressing apprehensi­on of deteriorat­ion in law and order if the film was released.

Rajasthan CM Vasundhara Raje had urged Union informatio­n and broadcasti­ng minister Smriti Irani on Saturday to ensure the movie is not released without adequate changes. The Central Board of Film Certificat­ion has sent the film back to the produceran­dsaidtheap­plication form was “incomplete”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India