Elite Group C

Guwahati: Assam 121 and 132 (S Roy 56, R Mohanty 6/55, D Pradhan 2/35) vs Odisha 240 and 16/1. Odisha won by nine wickets Lahli: Haryana 276 and 185 (H Rana 86, N Saini 64) vs Goa 177 and 30/2 in 12 overs (H Patel 1/10) Srinagar: Tripura 124 and 233/4 in 81 overs (S Patel 71*, U Bose 67, W raza 3/59) vs J&K 442

Ranchi: Rajasthan 100 & 379 (A Menaria 125, A Roy 4/97) vs Jharkhand 152 & 24/0 in 8 overs New Delhi: Services 260 and 35/1 (A rajpoot 1/12) vs Uttar Pradesh 535/9d (R Singh 163, P Garg 88, d Pathania 4/104)

Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chairman Ehsan Mani admitted they didn’t have all ends covered while claiming ~447 crore as compensation from the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) which is the reason why they lost the arbitration case heard by ICC’s Dispute Resolution Committee.

The PCB had claimed a hefty compensation from BCCI alleging that they didn’t honour an alleged Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) where six bilateral series between 2015-2023 was agreed.

The BCCI always maintained that the one page letter signed by erstwhile secretary Sanjay Patel was only a letter of intent and they could possibly have never played without government permission due to prevailing tension between the neighbouring countries.

“It is disappointing. The fact is that before filing the case the PCB had consulted the queens counsel lawyers in England and were advised that the claim for compensation was strong and on this basis the PCB went into arbitration and litigation,” Mani said.

KARACHI: