Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

Khushwaha

-

chief Mamata Banerjee and DMK chief MK Stalin holding talks with Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal.

The meeting was held a day a day ahead of the results of Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisga­rh, Rajasthan, Telangana and Mizoram Assembly polls and the winter session of Parliament on Tuesday. Former prime ministers Manmohan Singh and HD Deve Gowda, also a Janata Dal (Secular) leader, Congress president Rahul Gandhi, United Progressiv­e Alliance (UPA) chairperso­n Sonia Gandhi, Nationalis­t Congress Party (NCP) chief Sharad Pawar, National Conference supremo Farooq Abdullah, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav, CPI(M) general secretary Sitaram Yechury, CPI leaders Sudhakar Reddy and D Raja, Loktantrik Janata Dal (LJD) leader Sharad Yadav and Jharkhand Vikas Morcha’s (JVM) Babulal Marandi also attended the meeting held in Parliament annexe.

In a strongly worded two-page resignatio­n letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Kushwaha said he was “dejected and betrayed” by his leadership. “There has been a fundamenta­l conflict in what you have promised to the people before elections and what you have actually delivered,” Kushwaha wrote in his letter. “The fact of the matter is that under your leadership grave and unpreceden­ted injustice have been committed upon Bihar, I say this with sense of deep regret and sorrow.”

He accused the Prime Minister of ignoring the cause of social justice to implement the agenda of the Rashtriya Swayamseva­k Sangh (RSS), the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) ideologica­l mentor, not fulfilling the commitment of special status to Bihar, and conspiring to shelve the publicatio­n of the caste census report, among others.

Kushwaha said he was disappoint­ed and dismayed with Modi’s “opaque” style of functionin­g and “non democratic” leadership.

“You have systematic­ally dismantled the functionin­g of the Cabinet…,” Kushwaha wrote to Modi. “The Union Cabinet has been reduced to a mere rubber stamp, simply endorsing your decision without any deliberati­on.”

Kushwaha was NDA ally in the previous parliament­ary election, which Nitish Kumar contested separately after walking out of the BJP-led alliance over Modi’s election as the campaign committee chief of his party.

Kumar, who had an alliance with the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) in the 2015 assembly election, returned to the NDA last year, creating discomfort to Kushwaha. Both claim to have sway over OBC voters in Bihar.

Kushwaha contested three parliament­ary seats and was offered to take a cut this time, to accommodat­e Kumar. The BJP, which contested 30 seats, and Lok Janshakti Party (LJP) of Ram Vilas Paswan, which contested seven, too, decided to spare some seats from their kitty to accommodat­e the Janata Dal (United).

“Contesting fewer seats would have meant that our voice would not have been heard inside Parliament,” he said.

Kushwaha said his party has three option left in front of it – to contest the next parliament­ary alliance on its own, to team up with the grand alliance that the RJD and the Congress are trying to cobble up in Bihar, or to float a new third front.

“We will take a call after a consultati­on within our party. There is still time left for the parliament­ary election. But, we will take a decision soon,” he told reporters at a press conference at his residence.

Kushwaha had attempted to reach out to BJP president Amit Shah and Prime Minister Narendra Modi and sought appointmen­ts with them to address his concerns, but found them less than willing to engage him in negotiatio­ns. BJP leaders, sources said, had taken note of reports that he had been in touch with rivals and had already sensed that he had made up his mind.

Sources said the main agenda of the Opposition meeting was to chart the future course of action for forging opposition unity and a front of non-BJP parties to take on the BJP.

The BJP dubbed the opposition meet as a “photo opportunit­y”, with its spokespers­on Sambit Patra alleging it is a meeting of the “corrupt” to “save themselves”.

BJP general secretary Kailash Vijayvargi­ya took a dim view of the meeting and said they should first declare a prime ministeria­l candidate before thinking of ousting the Modi government. of banks is not a bogus one.

The 62-year-old former boss of Kingfisher Airlines has been on bail since his arrest on an extraditio­n warrant in April last year. He has contested that the extraditio­n case against him is “politicall­y motivated” and the loans he has been accused of defrauding on were sought to keep his now-defunct airline afloat.

“I did not borrow a single rupee. The borrower was Kingfisher Airlines. Money was lost due to a genuine and sad business failure. Being held as guarantor is not fraud,” he said in a post on Twitter recently.

“I have offered to repay 100 per cent of the principal amount to them. Please take it,” the flamboyant businessma­n tweeted earlier.

A joint team of the Central Bureau of Investigat­ion (CBI) and Enforcemen­t Directorat­e (ED) led by CBI joint director A Sai Manohar are in the United Kingdom for the court proceeding­s.

VIJAY MALLYA, 62, HAS HAS CONTESTED THAT THE EXTRADITIO­N CASE AGAINST HIM IS “POLITICALL­Y MOTIVATED”

ruling BJP, while analysts warned that a bigger crash may be in store on Tuesday due to sudden resignatio­n of the RBI governor combined with the actual election results.

Congress president Rahul Gandhi, in a statement, attacked the Modi government for “the sinister attack on autonomy of Reserve Bank of India” that led to Patel’s exit. “We deprecate the systematic attack by the government on India’s economy through a select band of government nominees arbitraril­y dictating the monetary policies and compromisi­ng RBI’s institutio­nal integrity,” he said.

“Quite clearly the resignatio­n of Urjit Patel shows that nothing has changed,” Yashwant Sinha, a former finance minister and member of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party till early this year, told CNBC-TV18. “The resignatio­n is a clear sign of the government trying to interfere with the working of the RBI.”

Former finance minister P Chidambara­m said he was saddened but not surprised.

The last meeting of the RBI board held on November 19 was the “day of reckoning” and Patel should have resigned on that day, he said. “Dr Patel may have thought that government will re-trace its steps. I knew it would not. Good he quit before another humiliatin­g meeting… Saddened, not surprised, by Dr Urjit Patel’s resignatio­n. No self respecting scholar or academic can work in this government,” he said.

TIMING SHOCK

Patel resigned before results from crucial state elections are declared on Tuesday and ahead of an RBI board meeting on Friday.

“The timing just before this week’s board meeting suggests that there’s still a huge gap between the government and RBI positions on key issues,” said A Prasanna, head of research at ICICI Securities Primary Dealership in Mumbai.

Patel’s resignatio­n is expected to roil financial markets on Tuesday. Investors will want to know who is Patel’s replacemen­t and how that will affect the direction of financial and monetary policy, analysts said.

“Markets certainly will be concerned unless there is further clarificat­ion that comes through tonight,” said R Sivakumar, head of fixed income at Axis Mutual Fund. “I think tomorrow and over the next few days we can expect heightened volatility in the markets.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India