Sajjan Kumar used political clout to derail 1984 riots cases: SC told
NEW DELHI: Former Congress leader Sajjan Kumar has been using his “large political clout” to derail trial and influence witnesses in cases related to 1984 anti-sikh riots, CBI told the Supreme Court Friday while seeking that life term given to him should be upheld.
Kumar has challenged in the top court the Delhi high court’s December 17, 2018 verdict sentencing him to life term in a case related to killing of five Sikhs in Delhi Cantonment’s Raj Nagar Part-i area of southwest Delhi on November 1 and 2, 1984, and burning down of a Gurudwara in Raj Nagar Part-ii.
In response to Kumar’s application seeking suspension of sentence and grant of bail, CBI saidhe was capable of “influencing/terrorising witnesses” and fair trial would not be possible in the pending case, if he is granted bail.
CBI has said brutal murders during the 1984 riots fall under the category of “crimes against humanity on parity with well known genocides worldwide like large scale killing of Armenians by Kurds and Turks, mass extermination of Jews by Nazis, mass killing of Bangladeshi citizens by the sympathisers of Pakistani Army and mass killing during various ethnic riots within India also”. Opposing Kumar’s application, it said that in this case the minority community was targeted by “spearheaded attacks of dominant political actors like the applicant/convict (Kumar) and duly facilitated by law enforcement agencies”.
In view of Kumar’s conduct in “using his political clout to derail trial and influence witnesses”, his sentence must be upheld and bail should not be granted, CBI said. “It took 34 valuable years of legal battle and courage shown by fearless witnesses/victims, which has resulted in his conviction and no leniency, therefore, on the ground of age should be granted,” it said.
CBI added that Kumar was a “political leader with a large political clout” and he has a “following in and around Delhi and is capable of influencing/terrorising witnesses”.
CBI said that at the time of the incident, Kumar was a Member of Parliament of the then ruling party in India and killings in this case took place in pursuance to the provocative speeches made by him against the Sikh community. “Considering the influence of the applicant/convict (Kumar) in the society, the fact that he belongs to one of the older political parties having substantial following, the gravity of the offence for which the trial is going on, the prosecution seriously apprehends that a fair trial in the aforementioned pending case would not be possible if the applicant/ convict is enlarged on bail.”