Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

What about the 278 bridges in Mumbai auditor said were safe?

- Eeshanpriy­a M S eeshanpriy­a@htlive.com

MUMBAI: Thursday’s incident, where six people were killed as a slab from the Himalaya bridge outside Chhatrapat­i Shivaji Maharaj Terminus (CSMT) collapsed, has led to one question – How safe are the other 278 civicowned bridges that were declared “not dilapidate­d” in a third-party structural audit?

The structural audit report of 296 bridges in Mumbai, conducted between September 2016 and August 2018, was presented in August 2018, a month after the Gokhale Bridge collapse in Andheri in July 2018. It said 110 bridges were in good condition, not needing repairs; 107 required minor repairs, and 61 were in need of major repairs and 18 were dilapidate­d beyond repair.

The same report said Himalaya Bridge was in “good condit i on, needing very minor repairs”. The findings raise doubts on not just the credibilit­y of the audit, but also the accuracy of the BMC’S audit procedure for infrastruc­ture.

The auditor, DD Desai Associated Engineerin­g Consultant­s and Analysts Pvt Ltd, also inspected 39 other bridges in the city, and declared 31 in need of major repairs, while 8 others needing minor repairs. Jaswant Arlekar, a certified structural consultant empanelled by BMC who inspected the Himalaya Bridge on Friday, said, “The structural audit carried out a year ago was not an audit in the real sense. Procedural­ly, there are four stages to conducting an audit of any infrastruc­ture. In Mumbai, we carry out only oneand-a-half of them, reasons being lack of time, and limited budget for the third-party auditor. This is the main problem. Their conclusion may not be accurate, as is proved by the collapse.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India