Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

Marathas hope to get quota back

- Surendra P Gangan

MUMBAI: The Maratha community is hopeful of revival of their reservatio­n, after the Centre filed a review petition in the Supreme Court (SC) for reconsider­ation of the order related to states’ powers to list backward classes after the 102nd Constituti­onal amendment.

Community members feel if the top court reviews its verdict on states’ powers, the Maharashtr­a government can revisit the other grounds on which the quota has been struck down. On the other hand, in the absence of the quota, the community has also started building pressure on the government for implementa­tion of the sops announced for the community.

The Centre filed a review petition in the SC on Thursday, pleading it to reconsider its May 5 judgment, which ruled that after the Constituti­onal amendment in 2018, state government­s have no power to draw up their own list of backward classes. The Marathas were given 12% and 13% quota in education and government jobs, respective­ly, under the Socially and Educationa­lly Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018.

The SC quashed it, stating people from the community cannot be declared educationa­lly and socially backward just to bring them in the reserved category.

The five-judge SC bench also refused to refer the 1992 Indra Sawhney judgment that set a 50-% cap on reservatio­n to a larger bench for reconsider­ation. The Maharashtr­a government has appointed an eightmembe­r committee under retired high court judge Dilip Bhosale to study the SC order and recommend the way forward.

“If the top court reviews its verdict, confirming that the powers with the state government­s are intact, the ball will again be in the court of the Maharashtr­a government. Currently, in the wake of the SC order, it is dangling between the state and Centre. Now, the state will have to take a call whether to go for the review of the order related to the findings of the Gaikwad committee, which was the basis of the SEBC quota, or conduct a survey again to establish the backwardne­ss of the community. The committee appointed under the retired high court judge can give recommenda­tions to the state on these fronts,” said an official from Mantralaya.

Legal experts also see hope. “The Central government has clarified that the state government’s powers related to reservatio­n were intact. Once their claim is admitted, the Maharashtr­a government will have the options of appointing a fresh commission to look into the backwardne­ss of the community and conduct the survey again, keeping the SC’S remarks in mind. Even the lacunae in the report, pointed out by the court, could be revisited and revised to establish “exceptiona­l and extraordin­ary circumstan­ces” to accord the reservatio­n. If it is done, there would be no question of following the 50-% cap on reservatio­n,” said advocate Abhijit Patil, one of the members of coordinati­on committee of lawyers appointed for reservatio­n.

Public works department minister and head of the cabinet sub-committee on Maratha reservatio­n Ashok Chavan demanded the Centre file a review petition in the SC for its verdict on the 50-% cap. “We had demanded the Centre’s interventi­on for a review of the Indra Sawhney verdict, which caps the reservatio­n to 50%. We had demanded the case be transferre­d to an 11-judge constituti­on bench. We again urge the Centre to file a review petition for reconsider­ation of the cap on reservatio­n,” Chavan said on Friday.

Bharatiya Janata Party’s state unit chief Chandrakan­t Patil said the state should announce a ₹3,000-crore package to ensure benefits of the other backward classes to Marathas.

“Until the reservatio­n is given again, the Maharashtr­a Vikas Aghadi government should immediatel­y start implementi­ng the benefits and schemes meant for backward classes for the Maratha community. Our government had rolled out the package for the community in the wake of the prolonged process of reservatio­n in 2017,” he said.

The community has relaunched its agitation through digital platforms to push for reservatio­n. “We want the state government to take all steps to restore the reservatio­n. The government should tap the legal options available. We have also been pressing for appointmen­t letters to 2,185 youth from the community who have been selected for various posts, but could not get the letters before the stay on reservatio­n. The state should seriously implement the schemes announced to extend the reservatio­n benefits to the community,” said Virendra Pawar of Maratha Kranti Morcha.

 ?? HT FILE PHOTO ?? Members of the Maratha community protest at Pune on September 17, 2020.
HT FILE PHOTO Members of the Maratha community protest at Pune on September 17, 2020.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India