Relaxed norms likely for battery PLI sops
Malyaban Ghosh & Utpal Bhaskar
NEW DELHI: India may relax some of the conditions set in the ₹18,100 crore production linked incentive (PLI) scheme to build Tesla-style gigafactories to manufacture batteries.
This follows concerns raised by battery makers such as Tata Chemicals Ltd and Amara Raja Batteries Ltd on the eligibility criterion as well as penalties and high localization norms to claim benefits under the scheme, said three people aware of the developments.
During talks with officials at NITI Aayog and the ministry of heavy industries and public enterprises, the companies aired apprehensions about the minimum bid size of 5 gigawatts per hour (GWH) set in the eligibility criterion that they believe may lead to the creation of monopolistic cartels and limit the marquee programme to a few battery makers, the people mentioned above said, seeking anonymity.
The PLI scheme requires companies to commit to build a manufacturing unit of at least 5GWH capacity and ensure minimum domestic value addition of 60% within five years at the ‘project’ level.
Subsequently, the battery or cell maker will have to achieve a domestic value addition of 25% and show a minimum investment of ₹225 crore per GWH within two years, raising it to 60% domestic value addition within five years “either at mother unit, in-case of an integrated unit, or at the project level, in-case of “hub and spoke” structure.
Through this scheme, the Union government is looking to tap direct investments of about ₹45,000 crore from local and overseas firms over the next decade. It also expects to save up to ₹2.5 lakh crore through lower crude oil imports.
One of the three people cited above said officials at NITI Aayog and the ministry of heavy industries and public enterprises are working on relaxing some of the eligibility and other criteria after meeting almost all the Indian companies interested in the scheme.
“The announcements could be made in the next few weeks. Most companies have engaged with the government, and the officials also understood that certain changes are needed in the scheme to encourage the companies,” the person said.
In a letter to NITI Aayog on 17 March, the India Smart Grid Forum said if the current eligibility criterion were to be followed, “maximum 3-5 parties could garner the entire PLI of 50GWH.”
This might lead to the creation of monopolistic cartels, “but also run the risk of awarding the entire PLI scheme to limited battery chemistries that may be unviable or obsolete in few years.”
It also requested NITI Aayog to reserve 30% of the proposed 50GWH capacity under the PLI scheme for smaller players who can set up a plant with a minimum capacity of 1GWH.
Global firms such as Panasonic Corp, LG Chem Ltd and CATL Ltd are still to make any announcements on starting lithium-ion cell manufacturing in India. Indian firms such as Tata Chemicals, Amara Raja Batteries and Exide Ltd have meanwhile announced plans to make lithium-ion cells and batteries in the coming decade.
“Most firms said production is a factor of market demand and not incentives. Hence, if there is no demand from the local market, then companies cannot be penalized for not producing deliberately. Also, the 60% localization target is high and given the current demand, meeting the target looks tough,” said the second person mentioned above.