Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)
A judge learns, and teaches
With rare introspection, a Madras HC judge displays sensitivity to LGBTQIA issues
Iam the society, with all the misconceptions present. Now I’m working through it and engaging in the process of unlearning, so it is me who needs to convey this understanding to the rest of the society that stands where I once stood.” These are the words of Justice N Anand Venkatesh of the Madras High Court (HC), who underwent voluntary “psycho-education” on gender and sexuality before passing interim orders on June 7 that directed various state and central agencies to ensure that persons belonging to the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, Asexual (LGBTQIA) communities do not face discrimination. The judge was hearing the case of a lesbian couple who moved the court seeking protection from police action, based on complaints filed by the women’s parents, who felt ashamed by the sexual identities of their daughters. The court asked the police to close the case and issued a directive that police should close such complaints if it finds that the person in question is of the LGBTQIA community in a consensual adult relationship.
In a country where social norms trump the law and even heterosexual adults face immense violence for falling in love with a person of the “wrong” caste or faith, it is not hard to imagine how same-sex couples, particularly women, are doubly vulnerable, stigmatised on account of a barely legitimate love and subject to patriarchal control over their sexuality. Before Section 377 was read down by the Supreme Court in 2018, the colonialera law that criminalised homosexuality was routinely weaponised to extort and threaten gay men and genders assigned male at birth. Other sections of the Indian Penal Code continue to be used for those assigned female gender at birth — usually, one partner is charged with kidnapping the other; parents file missing persons’ reports, prompting the police to conduct an investigation and bring the “charge” back, irrespective of age or consent.
Justice Venkatesh’s order recognises that society changes. The sensitisation of the police, judiciary, even medical professionals is essential, and they need to unlearn socially acceptable patriarchal notions that women are charges of parents till they wed. It would behove authorities to remember what the judge wrote, “Ignorance is no justification for normalising any form of discrimination.”