India knocked out in knockouts, again BBL experience gave England the edge, says Dravid

Top-order batters’ conservative starts finally catch up with India as England thrash them by 10 wickets to enter final

ADELAIDE: As the lights slowly went out at the Adelaide Oval after a sobering night for India, videos of an emotional Rohit Sharma — a stoic-looking Rahul Dravid by his side — were going viral on social media. He is distraught, speechless and downright inconsolable.

Sharma has seen quite a few highs and lows. But no defeat could have been as numbing as this. Only one team showed up at the game on Thursday night. India, after all their year-long talk of playing fearless cricket, were schooled by England as their World Cup campaign ended in a whimper.

To be hammered by 10 wickets in a World Cup semi-final is a slap in the face. But let this deflating defeat, the carefully sorted bouquet of bilateral tours in the coming months or the IPL auctions in December not distract you from the bigger reality: India have a mindset problem. How else do you explain such a bunch of IPL superstars faltering in the semi-finals every time in the last four World Cups — 2015, 2016, 2019 and now?

Handling pressure

Sharma admitted they were “a little nervy”. “You can’t really go and teach how to handle pressure,” he said after the match. “All these guys have played enough cricket to understand that. I mean, look, a lot of these guys when they come out and play in the playoffs in the IPL and all of that, it’s a highpressure game, some of these guys are able to handle that.

“When it comes to the knockout stages, it’s all about handling that pressure. Holding yourself a little bit and keeping calm. I thought the way we started off with the ball was not ideal. That shows we were a little nervy to start off with the ball, but again we’ve got to give credit to those openers as well, they played really well.”

Losing the toss was never a good sign in the first place. But the start was even more baffling. Between Sharma, Rahul and Kohli, India played 73 balls, scoring just 72 runs. England crossed that mark in the 41st ball of their innings. India scored 100 in the first 15 overs, adding 68 in the last five purely because of Pandya’s genius.

1

2

But England had reached 98 by the halfway mark. The difference in game awareness also stood out in how England kept hitting the shorter square boundaries better than India.

“We wanted to keep it tight, not give room, we looked at Adelaide pretty well, we know where the runs are scored,” said Sharma. “Square of the wicket is what we were quite aware of, and that’s where all the runs went today.”

Disciplined bowling

3

England’s bowlers were far more disciplined, starting with Ben Stokes, Chris Woakes and Sam Curran in the first three overs. By the last over of the powerplay, Adil Rashid was bowling with guile and precision, conceding just 20 runs and picking the valuable wicket of Yadav.

There was a clear intent on not giving India any pace to work with. But when India started defending, Bhuvneshwar Kumar bowled seventh stump

4

5

INDIA

Extras Total FoW:

Bowling:

6

7

8

168 lines before overcompensating and straying towards Buttler’s leg. The England captain picked three easy fours and a wide.

England were away and Alex Hales rubbed it in well, sweeping and pulling India’s bowlers at will.

Dropped catches, misfields galore, listless bowling, India looked tired and defeated even before the bell finally sounded.

Let’s also not shy away from the fact that India’s T20 game needs an urgent top-down overhaul, starting with the trio of Sharma, KL Rahul and Virat

9

Extras Total Bowling:

Kohli.

10

11

Overhaul needed

12

4 170

That India were turning a blind eye to the root of the problem was apparent in how the topthree were being shielded while the rest of the batting was being shuffled around. Kohli found his touch and channelled his genius into a nerve-wracking win against Pakistan at the MCG but barring that effort it has either been Suryakumar Yadav or Hardik Pandya to the rescue. And both don’t get to bat till almost the backend of the innings.

13

14

15

16

Australia’s unique conditions — India have never played here at this time of the year — were offered as a reason for the slow starts. But when you see England’s openers blaze away to an unbeaten partnership of 170 runs you start wondering if something was amiss.

The overhead conditions hadn’t changed drastically. England captain Jos Buttler later said the pitch too hadn’t changed much. “Obviously there was a little bit of spin in the wicket when you drove it into the surface, but I thought it was a good wicket,” he said.

Sharma’s struggles

Where is it going wrong then? India’s experiments with their batting always excluded Sharma, Rahul and Kohli. There was no attempt to give Rishabh Pant or Deepak Hooda, who showed such promise with a quick hundred against Ireland, a higher position and long-term backing.

Sharma normally reserves his best for the ICC events. Not this time. Rahul, it emerged, has the following scores in T20 World Cups against the top eight teams:

17

18

19

20

3(8 balls) vs Pakistan (Dubai), 18(16) vs New Zealand (Dubai), 4(8) vs Pakistan (Melbourne), 9(14) vs South Africa (Perth) before he was dismissed for 5(5) on Thursday. And Kohli the chaser is poles apart from Kohli the first innings anchor.

Planning gone wrong

The planning was dubious as well. What was the point of selecting Yuzvendra Chahal if he doesn’t get a game on Australian pitches that are offering turn and bounce?

When Mark Wood, Lockie Ferguson and Naseem Shah were breathing fire, India were opening with the medium pace of Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Arshdeep Singh. Mohammed Shami too was left in cold storage for almost a year.

Dinesh Karthik was being protected from spinners in middle overs while Pant was left cooling his heels before he was suddenly summoned, Axar Patel was getting games because he could bat — nothing about how India prepared and ultimately played looked right. And it was bound to hurt one day.

ADELAIDE: In the aftermath of India’s 10-wicket humbling to England in the T20 World Cup semi-final on Thursday, coach Rahul Dravid was asked if Indians were at a disadvantage because they are not allowed to play in overseas franchise leagues.

Most of England’s cricketers play in Australia’s Big Bash League later during the summer and their experience clearly showed in a clinical display against India.

Experiences like these always help but Dravid felt there is no easy solution to this. “I mean, sure, there’s no doubt about it the fact that England— a lot of their players have come here and played. In this tournament, it certainly showed,” he said.

“It’s tough. I think it’s very difficult for Indian cricket because a lot of these tournaments happen right in the peak of our season. I think it’s a huge challenge for us. Yes, I think a lot of our boys maybe do miss out on the opportunities of playing in a lot of these leagues.

“But if you were to—it’s really up to the BCCI to make that decision, but the thing is it’s right in the middle of our season, and with the kind of demand there would be for Indian players, if you allowed all the Indian players to play in these leagues, we would not have a domestic cricket. Our domestic trophy, our Ranji trophy would be finished, and that would mean Test cricket would be finished.”

India’s women cricketers are allowed to play in overseas leagues but not the men. There is a school of thought that even if the BCCI allows the players who are not able to participate in first-class cricket, it might create a precedent for others to completely give up on their domestic careers.

“I know a lot of people talk about it, but we have to be very careful when we have to understand the challenges that Indian cricket faces or the BCCI would face in a situation like this. You’d see all our boys— like a lot of boys being asked to play leagues right bang in the middle of our season. We’ve seen what that’s done to West Indian cricket, and I would definitely not want Indian cricket to go that way. It would certainly affect our Ranji Trophy, it would affect Test cricket. Indian boys playing Test cricket is pretty important for the Test game, as well, I would think,” the 49-year-old said.

Hales on cloud nine

“India in the semi-final, big occasion, I’m so happy with how I played, it’s special,” said Alex Hales, who had been dropped on the eve of the 2019 50-over World Cup and thought his England career was over.

“I never thought I’d play in a World Cup again so this is so special, and to do it in a country where I love playing. It’s one of the best nights of my career,” Hales, who scored an unbeaten 86 off 47 balls, said.

KL Rahul c Buttler b Woakes 5 (5) R Sharma c Curran b Jordan 27 (28) V Kohli c Rashid b Jordan 50 (40) S Yadav c Salt b Rashid 14 (10) H Pandya hit wicket b Jordan 63 (33) R Pant run out 6 (4) R Ashwin not out 0 (0) (w3) 3 (6 wkts, 20 overs) 109, 2-56, 3-75, 4-136, 5-158, 6168

Stokes 2-0-18-0, Woakes 3-0-24-1, Curran 4-0-42-0, Rashid 40-20-1, Livingstone 3-0-21-0, Jordan 4-0-43-3

J Buttler not out A Hales not out (w4) (for no loss, 16 overs) B Kumar 2-0-25-0, Arshdeep Singh 2-0-15-0, A Patel 40-30-0, Shami 3-0-39-0, Ashwin 20-27-0, Pandya 3-0-34-0 80 (49) 86 (47)

SCORECARD