Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Seeing red over green erosion

The Centre is rushing to clear industrial projects while weakening regulatory structures. This will devastate the environmen­t, writes DARRYL D’MONTE

-

The entire framework for monitoring environmen­tal compliance is being dismantled systematic­ally. This is a process that actually began with the UPA government, which replaced the feisty environmen­t minister Jairam Ramesh with the more pliant Jayanthi Natarajan. With industry lobbies still crying wolf, she too made way for Veerappa Moily, the petroleum and natural gas minister, without the UPA seeing anything contradict­ory in someone holding both those responsibi­lities.

In just a month, Moily issued permits for a hundred projects worth $40 billion which had been stuck, including the $12.6 billion Posco steel plant in Orissa — the country’s single-biggest foreign direct investment — that was blocked since 2005. In 2010, Ramesh had ordered the Orissa government to halt land acquisitio­n because the project violated the Forest Rights Act. As of this July, projects worth ₹227 billion were stalled in the country.

Even after the poll debacle, the Congress government in Maharashtr­a is trying to water down regulation­s, mindful that it may have only few months left in power. The water resources (formerly irrigation) department has permitted constructi­on worth ₹500 crore on the Krishna Marathwada lift irrigation scheme over seven years without environmen­tal clearances. It has feebly assured the ministry of environmen­t and forests (MOEF) that it will behave in future.

The MOEF is itself going easy on irrigation projects. Those below 2,000 hectares need not apply for clearances any longer, while those below 10,000 hectares can be sanctioned by state government­s.

Since Mumbai is any politician’s golden goose, the state government has asked the MOEF to drasticall­y revise the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) rules. At present, 38% of the city’s 437 sq km falls in the CRZ II belt, where a promoter can construct space 1.33 times the size of the plot the building occupies. This can go up to 4 times with various incentives, which amounts to ‘open sesame’ for builders. Union environmen­t minister Prakash Javadekar may grant this request, since a BJP-SHIV Sena government is virtually assured in Maharashtr­a later this year.

Javadekar has been working overtime to dilute regulation­s. He has ensured that mines which extract less than 16 million tonnes of coal a year and want to increase their output by half no longer have to hold a public hearing. The government’s appeal to mine owners to accept public scrutiny and protect the environmen­t does not reassure anyone.

Similarly, gram sabhas need not be consulted before companies begin prospectin­g in forests and diverting land to industrial use, which waters down the Forest Rights Act. Reforestin­g lands which have been damaged by such use is also no longer required. Instead of tribal village councils certifying that their rights had been settled before consenting to projects, the district administra­tion is empowered to do so, regardless of the number of villages displaced by the projects.

The NDA government has amended the environmen­t assessment notificati­on of 2006 and now allows promoters of projects up to a certain size to approach state government­s, rather than the Centre. As one can see from Maharashtr­a’s example, states are more venal in granting such exemptions, since they act in collusion with crony capitalist­s and corrupt politician­s.

The MOEF is contemplat­ing clipping the wings of the National Green Tribunal, which was set up during the UPA regime and is the only agency below the Supreme Court which examines cases relating to environmen­t and forests. It is headed by a retired Supreme Court or high court judge, with up to 20 experts matching the number of judicial members. Till now, however, it has never been fully staffed. Worryingly, there is a move to convert the judicial tribunal into an administra­tive body under the ministry itself, which will rob the agency of its independen­ce and render it toothless.

Incidental­ly, the tribunal had recently held that it was illegal to appoint retired bureaucrat­s to chair statutory expert appraisal committees that review environmen­tal clearances. In fact, Javadekar has gone one step further by appointing environmen­t secretary V Rajagopala­n, who will retire at the end of this month, to chair the National Biodiversi­ty Authority. Moily had turned down his appoint ment, citing conflict of interest that amounted to the bureaucrat virtually overseeing his own appointmen­t as a news report put it. According to the Biodiversi­ty Act of 2002, which regulates the sustainabl­e use of biological resources and equitable sharing of rights, the authority should be headed by an eminent expert in the field.

The National Wildlife Board’s standing committee which just cleared most of 140 stalled projects in around 80 parks, sanctuarie­s and tiger reserves, has one only wildlife expert, R Sukumar, instead of the mandatory eight. Its remit is to scrutinise all projects that fall within the boundaries of these protected areas as well as a 10-km radius. Not surprising­ly, there are two representa­tives from Gujarat — one a retired forest official and the other from the Gujarat Ecological Education and Research Foundation an undistingu­ished state government body. Huge infra structure projects have been cleared by the board, like the 520 MW Teesta IV dam in Sikkim, which the committee had previously unanimousl­y rejected, pointing to other dams in the state which were illegal.

Even this litany is incomplete without mentioning how the Land Acquisitio­n Act, a flagship UPA law, is being sought to be reviewed, while field trials of geneticall­y modified crops may be permitted. The outcome is that all mining, industrial and related projects will be given the green signal, causing widespread distress to those who pay the price of such unmonitore­d growth. This indicates that the NDA is insensitiv­e to the millions, particular­ly in central India, who will be displaced or otherwise penalised in the name of developmen­t.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? The National Wildlife Board’s standing committee, which just cleared most of the 140 stalled projects in around 80 parks, sanctuarie­s and tiger reserves, has only one wildlife expert instead of the mandatory eight
GETTY IMAGES The National Wildlife Board’s standing committee, which just cleared most of the 140 stalled projects in around 80 parks, sanctuarie­s and tiger reserves, has only one wildlife expert instead of the mandatory eight

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India