Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

#Metoo juggernaut is rolling; some gains are visible

- SMRUTI KOPPIKAR

ONLY WHEN VOICES LIKE THOSE OF DUTTA ROSE ABOVE THE COLLECTIVE SILENCE AND WERE JOINED IN BY OTHERS THAT THE LAW WAS TAKEN SERIOUSLY

When Tanushree Dutta lit the spark last week, it did not seem to immediatel­y resonate and turn into a movement. But over the last one week, after a woman comic called out a fellow comedian, the juggernaut has rolled on. A number of women across different sectors have come out with their stories, either of regular everyday sexism they faced at work or horrific, gutwrenchi­ng stories of how they were sexually abused and harassed by men in positions of power at their workplaces. Yes, the #Metoo movement has caught on – and not just in Bollywood but across the entertainm­ent industry, news media organisati­ons, the comedy sector, and even the political world.

In the last week, men accused of sexual harassment have had to quit their high-position jobs or were marginalis­ed: a happening film company – Phantom Films – was dissolved, Netflix is reconsider­ing working with some of the men who did nothing when apprised of harassment, a top-rated actor like Hrithik Roshan stated it would be difficult to work with someone accused of sexual harassment like Vikas Bahl, the industry’s favourite “cultured father” Alok Nath’s creepiness stands exposed, writers and poets and filmmakers whose names elicited awe for their work had to apologise to women on public platforms.

Also, organisati­ons discovered – or re-discovered – the sagacity of taking the law on sexual harassment seriously and institutin­g a working Internal Complaints Committee; a few people in Bollywood are at least discussing how to make the workplace safer. And the movement reached the doorsteps of the Central government as women journalist­s accused junior minister in PM Narendra Modi’s cabinet, MJ Akbar, of sexual harassment in his previous avatar as a top-notch editor.

Most importantl­y, organisati­ons such as the National Commission for Women and Maharashtr­a’s state commission have picked up the stories and asked for formal complaints to be filed against the men named. Meanwhile, Dutta has filed a police complaint, the industry associatio­n – Cine and TV Artistes Associatio­n – seems to be backing her and is willing to reopen her case.

These are some gains already. There may well be more. One’s scepticism about the movement in this column last week turned out to be misplaced. There have been attempts to derail and delegitimi­se the #Metoo movement, question its credential­s and reach.

Typically, some men have challenged the relevance of these accusation­s ten or nearly 20 years after the incidents occurred. Unsurprisi­ngly, instead of quietly listening to the women’s stories, introspect­ing and changing workplace behaviour, men have tried to tell women how to address the issue.

Worse, they have attempted to start a parallel campaign. While anyone abused or harassed sexually deserves to be heard irrespecti­ve of their gender, this has been women’s burden given the years of sexism and misogyny they have had to put up with, given how patriarcha­l social systems and organisati­ons are. Sexual references have been thrown women’s way whether she is an actress, a journalist or a maid.

For years, there was no law. Since 2013, the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibitio­n and Redressal) Act has been in force.

Yet, till a movement like #Metoo spread and touched offenders past and present, the existence of the law had little meaning. It is only when voices like those of Dutta rose above the collective silence and were joined in by dozens of others that the law was taken seriously. It’s when the naming and shaming happened that the law was read up on.

Even so, it touches only a section of the women workforce. What would make the difference to lakhs of women – maids, farm workers, constructi­on labourers, others in the informal sectors and down the caste hierarchy, those who do not have access to social media to name and shame – is if their offenders were brought under its ambit and made to pay a legal price. That may still be some distance away.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India