Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

‘Decide on razing 19-ha mangroves within a month’

- HT Correspond­ent

MUMBAI : The Bombay high court (HC) on Tuesday directed the Maharashtr­a Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA) to decide within a month on the National High Speed Rail Corporatio­n Limited’s (NHSRCL) proposal to clear 19-hectare (ha) mangrove cover in Thane and Palghar for the Mumbai-ahmedabad bullet train.

In its proposal to MCZMA, NHSRCL stated that 1,50,752 mangrove trees spread over 18.92ha would be affected by the corridor. On December 22, 2018, the coastal authority asked them to first obtain the high court’s nod to consider a proposal seeking removal of mangroves.

The rail corporatio­n then approached the HC, stating that of the 508-km high-speed corridor, 155.642km passes through Maharashtr­a, affecting 131.30ha of forests, including mangroves spread over 32.43ha.

The petition said of the 32.43km passing through CRZ areas in Maharashtr­a, 8.39km would be undergroun­d and at some places, the train will pass through an elevated viaduct. This plea, however, stated that only 53,467 mangrove trees spread over an area of 13.36ha would be affected by the corridor.

NHRSCL’S counsel, advocate Pralhad Paranjape, said MCZMA rejected the proposal on the grounds that the HC has prohibited cutting of mangroves. The lawyer said NHSRCL has proposed to plant five times the actual number of mangroves affected by the high-speed rail corridor, against the statutory requiremen­t of thrice the number. Paranjape submitted the authority failed to take into considerat­ion that the corridor is a public interest project.

A division bench of justice Bhushan Gavai and justice NJ Jamadar then asked why the bench should entertain a petition that has been moved before obtaining other requisite permission­s.

Paranjape responded saying NHSRCL has submitted an applicatio­n to the Ministry of Environmen­t and Forests (MOEF), which is pending considerat­ion. He, however, promised they don’t intend to undertake any work before obtaining all requisite permission­s.

Finding that MOEF was a necessary party to the proceeding­s, the court then directed NHRSCL to add them as party respondent to the petition and issued a notice to the ministry. The petition will come up for hearing after five weeks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India