Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Data on mishaps suggest railways’ track record has actually improved

Earlier there were two sources of data and people failed to recognise the definition­al difference­s between them

- BIBEK DEBROY

The National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) brings out an annual publicatio­n, In the past, this has also been used as source for figures on railway accidents. For example, in 2015, 26,066 people died because of railway accidents and 2,650 because of railway crossing accidents. Since 2016, NCRB no longer publishes figures on railway accidents. It only has numbers on crimes in railways. Therefore, the sole source for data on railway accidents is now Indian Railways (IR), such as

In the past, people often tried to match the two sources, failing to recognise there were definition­al difference­s between them. Let me give you a quote from the latest Year Book. “There were 103 consequent­ial train accidents in 2016-17 as compared to 106 accidents during 2015-16.” This does not include Konkan Railway. Notice the qualifier. We think IR reports all accidents; but IR reports only “consequent­ialacciden­ts”,or“serious accidents”. What is a consequent­ial accident? An accident is anything that adversely affects the engine, rolling stock, permanent way and works, fixed installati­ons, communicat­ions, passengers or railway servants. We usually think of accidents from a passenger perspectiv­e.

For purposes of reporting and analysis, IR classifies accidents under several heads — from A to R. For instance, A1 and A3 will be collisions of trains carrying passengers; A2 or A4 collisions of trains not carrying passengers; B represents fire or explosion in trains; C, trains running into road traffic and/or road traffic running into trains at level crossings; D, derailment­s; E, other train accidents; F, averted collisions; G, breach of block rules; H, a train passing a sig-

Crime in India. Indian Railways, Year Book.

nal at danger; J, equipment failures; K, L and M are failures of permanent way, electrical equipment, signalling and telecommun­ication, respective­ly; N, unusual incidents; P, casualties; Q, other incidents; and R, miscellane­ous. L2 is “no tension in overhead equipment for more than three minutes”. This may not fit with the usual perception of an accident, but its effect can be disastrous.

We are still left with the question. What is a consequent­ial or serious accident? Certain threshold values are defined for loss to railway property and interrupti­on to communicat­ions. A serious accident is one where there is a loss of life or grievous hurt to passengers, or those threshold values are exceeded, or where the Commission­er of Railway Safety (CRS) thinks an inquiry is needed. Data on railway accidents are also available through CRS. However, CRS doesn’t enquire into every railway accident and CRS data about accidents only include those where there has been a CRS inquiry.

That Year Book will also tell you IR attended to 982 accidents in 2016-17. How can this possibly match with 103? It doesn’t because 103 refers to those that are “consequent­ial”. There are some exclusion clauses that must be noted too: “(a) cases of trespasser­s run over and injured or killed through their own carelessne­ss or of passengers injured or killed through their own carelessne­ss; and (b) cases involving persons being Railways servant or holding valid passes/ tickets or otherwise who are killed or grievously injured while travelling outside the rolling stock of a passenger train such as on foot board, roof or buffer but excluding the inside of vestibules between coaches or run over at a level crossing or elsewhere on the railway track by a train; and (c) level crossing accident where no passenger or railway employee is killed or grievously hurt unless the Chief Commission­er of Railway Safety or Commission­er of Railway Safety is of the opinion that the accident requires the holding of an inquiry by the Commission­er of Railway Safety.” The exclusion clause makes it clear that a serious accident only includes instances where there is IR culpabilit­y. If you want to check IR’S track record, ask yourself what exactly you are interested in. Whatever the yardstick, you will find (a) cross-country, IR doesn’t do that badly; (b) Over time, the performanc­e has improved. Outside the Year Book, there are 2017-18 numbers and they tell the same story.

Bibek Debroy is chairman of Economic Advisory Council to the prime minister and a member of Niti Aayog The views expressed are personal

SINCE 2016, THE NATIONAL CRIME RECORDS BUREAU NO LONGER PUBLISHES FIGURES ON RAIL ACCIDENTS. THEREFORE, THE SOLE SOURCE FOR DATA ON ACCIDENTS IS NOW INDIAN RAILWAYS

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India