Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Keep out of our internal affairs: MEA to China

ARTICLE 370 Beijing calls India’s move on J&K status as illegal and invalid

- Sutirtho Patranobis letters@hindustant­imes.com

INDIA’S DECISION ON AUGUST 5, 2019, HAD TRIGGERED A STRONG RESPONSE FROM CHINA, MAINLY BECAUSE IT BELIEVED THE MOVE WOULD AFFECT ITS TERRITORIA­L CLAIMS IN LADAKH REGION

BEIJING/NEW DELHI: The government on Wednesday tersely asked Beijing to keep out of the internal affairs of other countries after China contended that India’s “unilateral” changes to the status of the former state of Jammu and Kashmir were illegal and invalid.

As the Pakistan government observed Yaum-e-istehsal, or a “day of exploitati­on”, to protest India’s decision last year to scrap Jammu and Kashmir’s special status and split it into two union territorie­s, Beijing called on New Delhi and Islamabad to resolve the dispute over Kashmir through dialogue and consultati­ons.

India’s decision on August 5, 2019, had triggered a strong response from China, mainly because it believed the move would affect its territoria­l claims in Ladakh region. Responding to a query from Pakistan’s staterun APP news agency about the impact of India’s move, Chinese foreign ministry spokespers­on Wang Wenbin told a regular news briefing that Beijing is closely following the situation in

Kashmir. He said: “Any unilateral change to the status quo is illegal and invalid. This issue should be properly resolved peacefully through dialogue and consultati­ons between the parties concerned.”

China’s position on the Kashmir issue, Wang said, is “clear and consistent”. He added: “This issue is a dispute leftover from history between Pakistan and India. That is an objective fact as laid out by the UN Charter, UN Security Council resolution­s and the bilateral agreements between Pakistan and India.”

External affairs ministry spokespers­on Anurag Srivastava responded to Wang’s remarks though a brief statement: “We have noted the comments of the Chinese MFA spokespers­on on the Indian union territory of Jammu and Kashmir. The Chinese side has no locus standi whatsoever on this matter and is advised not to comment on the internal affairs of other nations.”

Wednesday’s developmen­ts also came against the backdrop of the months-long India-china border standoff in Ladakh, which has taken bilateral relations to a new low. India has accused China of failing to deliver on commitment­s to withdraw its troops from friction points along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and asked it to sincerely implement measures for disengagem­ent and de-escalation.

Wang described Pakistan and India as neighbours who “cannot be moved away”. He said China hopes the two sides can properly handle difference­s through dialogue, improve relations and jointly safeguard peace, security and developmen­t of both countries and the wider region.

“Coexistenc­e serves the fundamenta­l interests of both and the common aspiration of the internatio­nal community,” Wang added. Pakistan on Tuesday

released a new “political map” in which it claimed all of Jammu & Kashmir, Ladakh and parts of Gujarat – a move that India described as “an exercise in political absurdity”.

In August last year, China had described the move to scrap Jammu and Kashmir’s special status as “unacceptab­le”, and urged India to respect Chinese territoria­l sovereignt­y and uphold peace and tranquilli­ty in the border areas. China had referred to the disputed territory of Aksai Chin, which China controls but India claims as part of the new union territory of Ladakh.

India had then rejected China’s criticism, saying the proposal to form new union territorie­s was an “internal matter” that had no implicatio­ns for the country’s external borders. New Delhi also pointed out that India and China had agreed to maintain peace along their disputed border until a mutually acceptable solution is found. External affairs minister S Jaishankar, during a visit to Beijing last August, explained India’s position, saying the change in administra­tive status of the region wouldn’t impact the LAC.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India