Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

The decades-old Maha-karnataka border dispute decoded

- Surendra P Gangan

MUMBAI: The over-six-decadeold border dispute between Karnataka and Maharashtr­a has taken a new turn after Karnataka chief minister Basavaraj Bommai on Tuesday staked a claim to 40 villages in Maharashtr­a.

The dispute over the villages with a Marathi-speaking majority began immediatel­y after India’s states were reorganise­d on a linguistic basis in November 1956, and 814 Marathispe­aking villages in the border area were included in Karnataka. The Maharashtr­a government, headed by Y B Chavan, invoked 21 (2)(b) of the States Reorganisa­tion Act, and staked a claim to the villages by writing to the central government. Decades later, the dispute is pending in the apex court, with the hearing expected to begin soon.

In 1966, the Centre appointed the Mahajan Commission, before which the state government staked a claim to 865 villages based on the 1961 census. The commission, in its report submitted in August 1967, recommende­d that 264 villages and Belgaum be included in Maharashtr­a and 247 villages be retained in Karnataka. Genesis of the dispute In 1948, the Belgaum municipali­ty requested that the district, which had a predominan­tly Marathi-speaking population, be incorporat­ed into the proposed Maharashtr­a state. However, Belgaum and 10 other talukas of Bombay Presidency were made part of Mysore state. Mysore was renamed Karnataka in 1973.

The Mahajan Commission report, tabled in the Lok Sabha in December 1970, was contested by Maharashtr­a. With no action taken by the Centre on the demand, the Maharashtr­a government in 2004 moved the

Supreme Court. Ten years later, Supreme Court chief justice R M Lodha appointed Manmohan Sarin, former chief justice of Jammu & Kashmir as court commission­er to submit a report on the issue after both states submitted documents to substantia­te their claims.

The Karnataka government, a year later, submitted an applicatio­n contesting the power of the apex court on the issue and maintained that it should be decided by the central government. The Sc-appointed commission­er did not submit his report after the SC’S powers were questioned. The apex court is now expected to resume the hearing before a three-judge bench, and first decide on the applicatio­n pending before the court.

Maloji Ashtikar, general secretary of the Madhyavart­i Maharashtr­a Ekikaran Samiti, a federation of organisati­ons fighting the cause, said, “Twenty lakh Marathi-speaking people from four districts are eagerly waiting to be part of Maharashtr­a. The Karnataka government has been trying to impose the state language and culture in these districts to strengthen its claim. We have been opposing suppressio­n and demanding inclusion.”

Fresh trigger

Ahead of the hearing in the SC, Maharashtr­a chief minister Eknath Shinde on Monday presided over the meeting of a high-level 19-member committee comprising all parties to request the apex court to expedite the hearing. Senior ministers Chandrakan­t Patil and Shambhuraj Desai will oversee the developmen­ts in the Supreme Court.

Besides the push to the legal proceeding­s, the state government announced that it would extend social schemes such as health insurance, benefits of the Chief Minister Relief Fund and pension to the next of kin of people who died fighting in the border dispute to those in Karnataka. The state government has also appointed senior advocate C S Vaidyanath­an to represent Maharashtr­a in the apex court.

The row was sparked on Tuesday when Bommai said that his government was seriously considerin­g the inclusion of 40 villages from Jat tehsil in Sangli district in Karnataka. He also announced that he would extend facilities and grants to Kannada-medium schools in Jat tehsil, and added that his government had prepared a plan to supply water to villages that were facing water scarcity.

Reacting strongly to this, Maharashtr­a chief minister Eknath Shinde said that no Maharashtr­a village would go to Karnataka. “The demand by village panchayats in Jat to be

THE DISPUTE OVER THE VILLAGES BEGAN AFTER THE STATES WERE REORGANISE­D ON A LINGUISTIC BASIS IN NOVEMBER 1956

included in Karnataka was made in 2012. We have implemente­d many water-supply schemes to resolve the problem of drinking water. We are addressing the issues of the people in the border areas on a war footing. We are in favour of resolving the border dispute amicably,” Shinde said on Wednesday.

Deputy chief minister Devendra Fadnavis said that not a single village would go to Karnataka. “The state will leave no stone unturned to get Belgaum, Karwar and Nipani into Maharashtr­a,” he said.

 ?? HT PHOTO ?? Eknath Shinde
HT PHOTO Eknath Shinde
 ?? ANI ?? Basavaraj Bommai
ANI Basavaraj Bommai

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India