Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

State clears infra projects for NAINA

- G. Mohiuddin Jeddy htmumbai@hindustant­imes.com

NPBSUS WHICH HAS BEEN OPPOSING NAINA FOR A DECADE NOW WILL FILE ITS OBJECTIONS TO THE DECISIONS

PANVEL: The state government has approved the policy for the redevelopm­ent of dilapidate­d buildings in the Navi Mumbai Airport Influence Notified Area (NAINA) region, that had been stuck due to NAINA regulation­s. While the state government has permitted 30% extra area, the villagers are demanding at least 2.5 FSI (floor space index) to make redevelopm­ent projects feasible for the developers. The demand for implementa­tion of Unified Developmen­t Control and Promotion Regulation­s (UDCPR) is being reiterated.

The state issued the notificati­on amending NAINA UDCPR just before the code of conduct came into force. It approves the proposal sent by CIDCO (City and Industrial Developmen­t Corporatio­n), the special planning authority for NAINA.

The decision applies to 94 villages in NAINA spread over 225.59 sq km, particular­ly the 23 villages for which Town Planning Schemes are ready in the first phase. The policy will apply to residents of dilapidate­d or 30-year-old buildings.

As per the notificati­on, such buildings will get an additional 30% FSI or the residents of the building will get a 15 sqm additional constructi­on area without payment of an additional premium for the redevelopm­ent of the buildings. If additional FSI is required, a premium will have to be paid as per the norms.

The state has given 30 days for suggestion­s and objections on the notificati­on to be submitted by April 15. It has appointed the assistant director of town planning of the Konkan Division for the purpose. The NAINA Prakalp Badhit Shetkari Utkarsh Samiti (NPBSUS) which has been opposing NAINA for a decade now will be filing its objections to the decisions.

The issue had also been taken up by Panvel MLA Prashant Thakur, with the government and Raigad guardian minister Uday Samant, with whom he had held a meeting recently. “There are hundreds of buildings in gram panchayat areas of NAINA which are in a pathetic state. Their redevelopm­ent wasn’t possible due to the establishm­ent of NAINA which did not have a proper policy. This decision will provide a major relief for all,” said Thakur.

The residents of the dilapidate­d buildings have been living under dangerous conditions with constant threats to their lives, said Thakur. “There have been some instances of slab and plaster falling in these buildings which have been a cause of concern and have caused injuries. The villagers can now look forward to better and safer houses.”

Not everyone is pleased by his move. NPBSUS wants at least 2.5 FSI to make redevelopm­ent feasible. It also wants the new UDCPR to be implemente­d in NAINA which will enable additional FSI. According to NPBSUS secretary Rajesh Keni, “We have been opposing NAINA for a decade now through various agitations. Finally, there seems to be some action, but it is not enough. I challenge those advocating the present policy to redevelop just one project on a no-profit-noloss basis and prove it is possible.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India