Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

HC relief for 4 acid attack survivors

- Sahyaja MS sahyaja.s@hindustant­imes.com

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court has granted permission to four individual­s to apply for benefits under the 2022 compensati­on scheme designed for victims of sexual and other crimes.

Even after delays, the ruling underscore­s the high court’s recognitio­n of the urgent needs of the applicants to access the new scheme. This scheme eliminates the previous cap of ₹5,00,000 on compensati­on, providing crucial support to the victims.

The court deemed the current case as deserving because the petitioner­s, after enduring an acid attack, had to seek compensati­on through this court. As the 2022 scheme was introduced during the proceeding­s, the court found it appropriat­e to allow them to apply for compensati­on under this scheme. The move aligns with directives from the Supreme Court for determinin­g compensati­on on a case-by-case basis.

The petitioner­s, three acid attack victims and the daughter of one of them, who was a minor at the time of the assault in October 2010, endured severe injuries inflicted by acid at the hands of their elder sister, husband, and son.

The victims underwent extensive medical treatment, including multiple reconstruc­tive surgeries, initially at Bhabha Hospital and later at KEM Hospital.

The financial burden of these procedures forced them to liquidate most of their assets. Even after receiving a compensati­on of ₹3 lakh under the state’s victim compensati­on scheme in 2016, they sought further compensati­on, citing the Supreme Court’s stance on the matter.

Advocate Kanhaiya S Yadav represente­d the petitioner­s when they approached the Bombay High Court in 2016, seeking free medical treatment in line with previous legal precedents. The court, granting interim relief in 2017, awarded an additional ₹2 lakh as compensati­on. In 2022, the state of Maharashtr­a introduced the Maharashtr­a Victim Compensati­on Scheme for Women Victims/survivors of Sexual Assault/other Crimes, providing a framework for determinin­g and disbursing compensati­on.

During a recent hearing, the petitioner­s expressed their intention to benefit from the new scheme. However, the state argued against it, citing a limitation clause requiring claims to be made within three years of the offence or conclusion of the trial.

A bench comprising Justices AS Chandurkar and Jitendra Jain found the case deserving of considerat­ion, considerin­g the traumatic nature of the acid attack and the subsequent legal proceeding­s.

The court ruled that the petitioner­s could indeed apply for compensati­on under the 2022 scheme, provided they do so within four weeks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India